Pages

Wednesday, November 20, 2019

The Thomas Crown Affair (1968) [PG] ****


A film review by James Berardinelli for ReelViews.net in 1999.

Sexual chemistry - that's what it's all about. Despite a competent caper plot and some interesting visual flourishes by director Norman Jewison, the real attraction of The Thomas Crown Affair is the relationship between Steve McQueen's title character and Faye Dunaway's Vicky Anderson. These two steam up the screen without revealing much flesh; when they're together, it's almost impossible to remember that the film purports to be about a masterfully executed, daring daylight bank robbery. And, while it's unfair to claim that no one really cares about that aspect of the production, once McQueen and Dunaway start their mating dance, it's undoubtedly a secondary concern.

The casting of McQueen and Dunaway was an inspired, if unorthodox, choice. At the time of filming in 1967, McQueen was at the top of his career, having already appeared in a pair of action-oriented classics, The Magnificent Seven and The Great Escape. Despite being cast against type, McQueen's matinee good looks and cool demeanor enabled him to get by as a suave, well dressed, highly educated criminal mastermind (part his success in the role can be attributed to the director, who kept urging McQueen to play the part like Cary Grant). Dunaway was relatively new to the screen, but, bolstered by her work in her debut feature, Bonnie and Clyde, she became Jewison's first choice. In both looks and acting, Dunaway matched McQueen - icy, serene, and stunning to gaze at. Neither gives a career performance here (in fact, both have moments of awkwardness), but the way they connect more than makes up for any acting deficiencies.

Everything in The Thomas Crown Affair is a game, from the way the characters interact with each other to the way the director toys with the audience. As far as crime caper films go, this one has a relatively lighthearted tone, at least up until the end when an expected betrayal and a surprise twist leaves the viewer with a bittersweet taste. Jewison has described the movie as possessing a European flavor and admits to having been influenced by the French New Wave. Nowhere is this more obvious than during the last scene. (It's worth noting that 30 years and dozens of caper films later, the closing twist isn't nearly as startling as it once was, but it still makes for an effective conclusion.)

Thomas Crown is one of Boston's wealthiest citizens, yet he has a passion for crime. He masterminds an audacious and meticulously plotted bank robbery not because he needs the money, but because he delights in attacking the establishment. For Thomas, beating the authorities is a game, and the cash is just the tangible proof that he won. For this heist, he has recruited seven men who don't know each other, given them precise instructions, then waited to pick up the money. Things go without a hitch, and Thomas is $2,660,527 richer (less the cuts he pays to his hired hands). But the bank's insurance company isn't willing to swallow the bill without a thorough investigation, so they put their best agent, Vicky Anderson, on the case. She joins Boston Police Detective Eddy Malone (Paul Burke), who is already hard at work tracking down leads. Vicky decides to toy with Thomas, meeting him, letting him know who she is and what she's after, and attempting to trick him into making a mistake. But Thomas, aware of what she's up to, calculates his every move. The attraction between them proves to be too much to resist and they end up doing the most unwise thing either could imagine: falling in love.

There is suspense in The Thomas Crown Affair, especially in relation to the question of whether Vicky will turn in Thomas, but it takes a back seat to the romantic tension, which Jewison wisely elevates to the boiling point during an unforgettable chess match filled with long glances, lingering close-ups, and obvious sexual imagery. (For example, Vicky can be seen stroking the head of a bishop while contemplating a move.) That scene - six and one-half minutes with only three brief lines of dialogue - ends in a 70 second kiss that dissolves into a blur of colors. It is one of cinema's most intensely erotic moments, due in large part to Jewison's directing, McQueen and Dunaway's silent acting, Hal Ashby's editing, and Michel Legrand's memorable score (Legrand, who wrote the music for The Umbrellas of Cherbourg, almost tops his work for that film here).

The film is structured in layers, with games built upon games. Vicky refers to this overtly on one occasion, noting that Thomas has won round three, but, for the most part, their victories and losses are unspoken. And we're never sure who the cat is, and who the mouse is. Thomas is playing against everyone --Vicky, the Boston Police, and himself. Vicky's game offers a more personal risk, because there's no way she can win. By defeating Thomas, she loses him. But, for her, surrender is not an option. There are few scenes during The Thomas Crown Affair when the characters let down their guard. Only when they're on the beach, racing across the sand in Thomas' dune buggy, do they appear completely at ease. For the audience, the heist scenes gain an extra level of tension because of our personal investment in the relationship. These characters are amoral, but we recognize they were made for each other, and hope that, somehow, they can end up together.

Jewison has described The Thomas Crown Affair as a victory of style over substance, and, in many ways, he's right. The script (by first-time screenwriter Alan R. Trustman, a former Boston lawyer) is light on dialogue, allowing Jewison and his cinematographer, veteran Haskell Wexler (with whom he had worked on his previous feature, In the Heat of the Night), to use a variety of sites and approaches to develop a powerful sense of atmosphere. Wexler experiments throughout The Thomas Crown Affair, turning in several unique and memorable shots. On one occasion, we see a character's face through a series of empty phone booths that makes it appear as if he's in a glass tunnel. During the initial crime, one of the robbers throws a flare and the camera skates behind it as it slides across the floor, trailing red smoke. Wexler also makes frequent use of reflections in mirrors and glass.

Perhaps the most innovative aspect of The Thomas Crown Affair is the use of multiple screens during the heist sequence. On several occasions, as many as six or seven separate images appear on the screen at the same time, each showing a different character. It's an effective way of cramming a lot of information into one frame, and, since it is used sparingly, it's unlikely to confuse the average viewer. Jewison has stated that he was compelled to use this technique after viewing Christopher Chapman's 17-minute short, A Place to Stand.

However, while style may be an important aspect of The Thomas Crown Affair, the real reason we're drawn into this deliciously decadent world is the mesmerizing chemistry that smolders between McQueen and Dunaway. Those who search for a recent example of this kind of interaction need look no further than Out of Sight, which developed a similar dynamic between George Clooney and Jennifer Lopez. The Thomas Crown Affair is a rare motion picture where the plot works just well enough to allow us to enjoy the character interplay without being distracted by obvious gaffes and logical errors. [Berardinelli’s rating: 3.5 out of 4 stars = 87.5/100]

Blogger’s comment: Steve McQueen was born in 1930, so he was 37 when this film was shot in 1967, although he looks ten years older. Thirteen years later, at the age of fifty, McQueen died of cancer in Juarez, Mexico in 1980.

I much prefer the 1999 remake with Pierce Brosnan and Rene Russo, which is a stronger film in both style and substance. My only criticism with the remake is that the act of stealing the painting and folding it into a briefcase would have split the wooden frame, damaging and possibly destroying the painting.

Labels: crime, drama, romance, Sixties, thriller

Berardinelli's original review

Top Gun: Maverick (2022) [PG-13] *****

A film review by James Berardinelli for ReelViews.net on May 22, 2022.


Top Gun: Maverick is one of those rare breeds: a sequel that’s better than the original. Due in part to the passage of 36 years in between installments, the second film arrives with a less glossy, more serious approach. Cold war rah-rah machismo has been replaced by a more reflective (although no less action-oriented) attitude. Tom Cruise, playing the title character, has supplanted toothy cockiness with a weathered, nuanced performance. In Top Gun, he was preening. Here, he’s acting. The differences extend to the screenplay (credited to Ehren Kruger, Eric Warren Singer, and Cruise’s current favorite collaborator, Christopher McQuarrie), which is less testosterone-drenched, to the tone, which is more grounded, to the technical elements, which are cutting-edge. The kernels in this popcorn crowd-pleaser frequently aren’t as frequently scalded or unpopped as in the original.

Top Gun: Maverick is selling nostalgia while at the same time remembering that younger viewers might not care about a movie that came out when their parents were kids. Although it’s possible to enjoy this movie on its own terms, it understandably works better for those who have seen (and remember) the 1986 box office king. Easter eggs and callbacks abound, even though only two actors – Cruise and Val Kilmer – have returned. At times, Top Gun: Maverick seems like a loose remake. The opening sequence, complete with Kenny Loggin’s Danger Zone, is a carbon copy, and many of the key notes are similar (although modernized). The shirtless volleyball game of the original has been updated to a shirtless football match (although the women are allowed to keep their tops on) and is edited in such a way as to tone down the homoerotic undercurrent.

Story-wise, the movie calls back not only to Top Gun but to a blockbuster from a decade prior: Star Wars. Top Gun: Maverick’s climax, which features an attack by a group of fighters on a secure uranium processing plant, is taken almost beat-for-beat from the Death Star run in Star Wars, right down to the need to navigate a narrow trench and bullseye a shaft. One can be forgiven expecting to hear a ghostly voice intone, Use the Force, Maverick as the moment approaches.


When the movie opens, we catch up with Captain Pete Maverick Mitchell in his current job as a test pilot for new and experimental aircraft. As Mitchell’s current superior, Admiral Chester Cain (Ed Harris), tersely notes, drones will soon make pilots extinct. He then transfers the insubordinate officer to the Navy’s fighter training program (a.k.a. Top Gun) as ordered by the Commander of the Pacific Fleet, Admiral Tom Iceman Kazansky (Val Kilmer). Iceman believes that Maverick has the qualities necessary to prepare an elite group of pilots for a top-secret, potentially suicidal mission. Maverick’s new bosses, Admiral Beau Simpson (Jon Hamm) and Admiral Solomon Bates (Charles Parnell), are skeptical. Complicating matters for Maverick is the presence of Lt. Rooster Bradshaw (Miles Teller) in the group. The son of the deceased Goose Bradshaw, Rooster holds a mammoth grudge against his new instructor. Maverick is also given cause to regret how he treated an old flame, Penny Benjamin (Jennifer Connelly), but finds her willing to re-ignite the flame.


As was the case in the first movie, there are too many secondary characters for any of them to achieve anything resembling three-dimensionality but at least in this case they have enough defining characteristics to avoid them seeming like a lineup of doppelgangers. One, Glen Powell’s Hangman, is an Iceman clone. Another, Monica Barbaro’s Phoenix, is the first female pilot of the Top Gun universe. And Lewis’ Pullman’s Bob isn’t just a nerd – he’s a nerd who looks like a nerd, not a buffed jock who says he’s a nerd.


One of my complaints with the original Top Gun was that the aerial scenes weren’t as well-choreographed, shot, and presented as one might have expected. Director Joseph Kosinski has corrected these issues. Top Gun: Maverick’s in-air sequences are always coherent, often exciting, and occasionally breathtaking. Some of this is the result of better technology but some is simply that Kosinski is a better fit for the material than Tony Scott was in 1986. The in-cockpit cameras give the viewer a you-are-there feeling and the decision to limit the use of computer effects avoids the artificiality that sometimes results from CGI reliance.


Still, as eye-popping as the dogfights and aerial maneuvers are, the centerpiece scene (and the one that will have the greatest meaning for Top Gun fans) is a simple one-on-one meeting between Maverick and Iceman. With the screenplay overlaying elements of actor Val Kilmer’s real-life struggle with throat cancer onto the story of Admiral Kazansky, the movie achieves something powerful and deeply moving in that scene. The subtext makes it about much more than a reunion between two rivals-turned-friends. The appearance was meaningful enough to Kilmer to coax him temporarily out of retirement. If it represents the final punctuation mark on a remarkably successful career, it would be difficult to envision a better ending.


It remains to be seen whether Top Gun: Maverick will be able to attract new fans with a fervor to match the older ones who are approaching this movie with the eagerness of a 36-year buildup. Cruise, the A-list marquee-topper who never gives less than 100% to any production, once again illustrates how he has managed to remain relevant over an amazing four-decade span when so many of his contemporaries have faded away. And, although Top Gun: Maverick is surely relying on some of the alchemy that made the formula successful in 1986, the film’s awareness of cultural and technological shifts in the interim has made for a more complete cinematic experience. This is unquestionably a production to be experienced on a big screen; resizing it for a television or tablet will diminish some of the most extravagant aspects, limiting suspense although not eviscerating the storytelling elements. [Berardinelli’s rating: 3 stars out of 4 = 75%]


Labels: action, drama, flying

IMDb 84/100

MetaScore (critics=78, viewers=73)

RottenTomatoes Averages (critics=82, viewers=98)

Blu-ray 

 

 

Saturday, October 5, 2019

Valley of the Kings (1954) [NR] ***


An edited film review by Andrew Wickliffe for thestopbutton.com on 11 April 2006.

Eighty-six minute movies are not supposed to be boring. Eighty-six minute sound films anyway. Valley of the Kings manages to be boring in the first twelve minutes. Even those twelve minutes are boring. It takes the film until just over the halfway point to actually get moving. Not interesting, not good but moving. There are three action scenes back-to-back: a sandstorm, a Bedouin duel, and a fist-fight atop a giant Egyptian statue. The film tries to start with action too: a horse-drawn buggy chase within the first six minutes. But chases are hard enough to do in cars, much less buggies.

Valley of the Kings was filmed on location in Egypt, so I imagine those visuals were much of the prospective appeal, but the writing’s bad, in multiple ways, and the director doesn’t know how to make the visuals work for the film. They’re background instead of attraction and the film still tries to replace content with them. At eighty-six minutes, it’s hard for a film to take much responsibility, and Valley of the Kings tells the story of the archeological proof of Joseph in Egypt (something archeology has yet to prove), and it’s a deep subject. A lot has to go on, and nothing goes on in Valley of the Kings. It tries to be a few films - one about this search for evidence, another about an adulterous relationship, and yet another (action-filled one) about the intrigue of grave-robbing, illegally selling antiquities and counterfeiting them. In the end, it doesn’t take any of these subjects seriously and there’s little to hold the film together except, of course, the locations - which are excellent in the second half - and Robert Taylor. Valley of the Kings is Taylor and Eleanor Parker’s second of three films together (for MGM). Their first, Above and Beyond, was great. This one manages to waste Parker by changing her character in the third act. She becomes positively unlovable in the last three scenes, then the film expects the audience to embrace her. She has a cuckold, played by Carlos Thompson, but the opening credits tell us the film stars Taylor and Parker. Taylor is getting the girl, so there aren’t many surprises once it gets going. Taylor is great in the film and would have been even better had to been serious film about archeology or adulterous affairs.

The film has a lot respect for the Muslim characters it portrays, much more respect then they get today in films - even in culturally sensitive films. It’s a reasonably important footnote in the history of American perspective of Muslims (Islamic fundamentalism hadn’t come around yet) and they’re treated with more respect than the European character.

Valley of the Kings isn’t terrible, thanks to the second half, but Robert Pirosh is a bad writer and a bad director. Of the two problems, the writing hurts the film most. With a good script and another twenty minutes, Valley of the Kings would still not be as good as Above and Beyond, but it wouldn’t be so middling. [Wickliffe’s rating: * out of 4 stars (25/100)

Credits: Directed by Robert Pirosh; screenplay by Pirosh and Karl Tunberg, from a book by C.W. Ceram; director of photography, Robert Surtees; edited by Harold F. Kress; music by Miklos Rozsa; released by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.

Starring: Robert Taylor (Mark Brandon), Eleanor Parker (Ann Barclay Mercedes), Carlos Thompson (Philip Mercedes), Kurt Kasznar (Hamed Backhour), Victor Jory (Tuareg Chief), Leon Askin (Valentine Arko, Antique Dealer) and Aldo Silvani (Father Anthimos).

Labels: action, adventure, Eleanor Parker, romance


Friday, July 26, 2019

Interrupted Melody (1955) [NR] ****


A film review by Andrew Wickliffe for thestopbutton.com on 9 Feb 2006.

Interrupted Melody is an interesting example of economic storytelling. The film covers about ten years, has a number of strong character relationships, but moves gently through all of it. It’s got moments where there isn’t any dialogue, just the look between characters, it’s got a great love story - and, even better, a great struggling marriage. Director Curtis Bernhardt deserves a lot of the credit - for example, he knows just how long to let these scenes go, and the first date between Eleanor Parker and Glenn Ford does better in five minutes what most films - most good films - spend twenty doing. It’s not just Bernhardt though. Interrupted Melody was co-written by Sonya Levien, who also worked on The Cowboy and the Lady and it had similarly perfect pacing.

Most of Interrupted Melody is a showcase for its actors, whether it’s Parker or Ford or even a young (and good-looking) Roger Moore. The film’s structure varies in focus - for instance, there’s a large part where Ford is the protagonist over Parker - but manages the transitions back and forth beautifully. So beautifully, in fact, I don’t even recall the first transition. The second, later one, I still do.

Besides being Parker’s best performance (probably, at least in the lead), Interrupted Melody has a great Glenn Ford performance. Ford never gets the proper respect - search for him on IMDb and the first title to come up is Superman, but he’s really good, especially in this, mid-1950s period of his career. Interrupted Melody is available on DVD, and it occasionally is shown on Turner Classic Movies. Wickliffe’s rating: **** out of 4 stars.

Blogger’s comment: In 1956, Eleanor Parker was nominated for an Oscar for Best Actress in a Leading Role for her performance in this film

CREDITS
Directed by Curtis Bernhardt; written by William Ludwig and Sonya Levien; directors of photography, Joseph Ruttenberg and Paul Vogel; edited by John D. Dunning; produced by Jack Cummings; released by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.

Starring Glenn Ford (Dr. Thomas King), Eleanor Parker (Marjorie Lawrence), Roger Moore (Cyril Lawrence), Cecil Kellaway (Bill Lawrence), Peter Leeds (Dr. Ed Ryson), Evelyn Ellis (Clara), Walter Baldwin (Jim Owens), Ann Codee (Madame Gilly), Leopold Sachse (Himself) and Stephen Bekassy (Count Claude des Vignaux).

Labels: biography, drama, Eleanor Parker, Fifties, music, romance


Friday, July 12, 2019

The Sound of Music (1965) [G] *****



A film review by Casey Broadwater for blu-ray.com on Nov. 3, 2010.


Hollywood insiders called it The Sound of Money when it started raking in loads of box office cash. Leading man Christopher Plummer, thinking it was too sentimental, referred to it as The Sound of Mucus. Influential film critic Pauline Kael even deemed it a sugar-coated lie that some people seem to want to eat. But let's set the cynicism aside for a moment. It may be syrupy, and it's definitely a Hollywood cash cow - even now, 45 years after its release - but has there ever been a film more sincerely joyful, more wide-eyed and earnestly optimistic than The Sound of Music? (If there has, I haven't seen it.) It's easy to be wary about unbridled hope, but this movie musical - the eighth and final collaboration between Richard Rodgers and Oscar Hammerstein II, the greatest composer/lyricist duo of the 20th century - comes by it honestly. There's no pandering here, no wink-wink irony, no sense of kitsch or camp. The Sound of Music genuinely believes in the possibilities of love, the certainty of good's triumph over evil, and the redeeming, transcendent power of song. Critics can scoff and cynics cringe, but there's a reason audiences world-over have been singing along with the film since 1965.

The based-on-a-true-story is almost universally familiar by now. Broadway star Julie Andrews plays Maria, a good-natured but troublemaking postulant at a convent in the Austrian Alps. Perhaps troublemaking is an overstatement. In the song Maria, sung by her wimple-wearing supervisors, we learn that Maria's main offenses are waltzing on the way to Mass, whistling on the stair, and - gasp! - singing in the abbey. Knowing that she's A flibbertigibbet! A will-o'-the-wisp! A clown! and perhaps too flighty to become a proper nun, the Mother Abbess (Peggy Wood) puts Maria on probation and sends her to Salzburg to serve as the governess of the seven von Trapp children, aged five to sixteen. Their father, Georg (Christopher Plummer), is a widower and former Navy captain, a hardcore disciplinarian who orders his kids around with the aid of an impossibly shrill whistle. Maria, of course, takes a different tact, winning the children over with song, sewing play clothes out of old drapes, climbing trees, going on mountaintop picnics, and putting on puppet shows. The captain's heart is slowly opened when he sees the change in his children, and he breaks off his engagement with the coldly shrewd Baroness Schraeder (Eleanor Parker) to marry Maria. Alas, there's trouble in paradise. These are the last golden days of Austria in the 1930s, and the Nazi threat looms over the Alps like a thundercloud. Don't worry, though, this is The Sound of Music, not Schindler's List, and despite a tense climax that finds the von Trapps hiding from SS foot soldiers in the abbey cemetery, the dénouement is pure - literal and figurative - escapism.

Every junction, twist, and turn of the plot is accompanied by song, and the musical numbers are so memorably infectious, there ought to be an auditory branch of the Centers for Disease Control working around the clock on an antidote for the inevitable ailment of getting these tunes stuck permanently in your head. Nearly every song has since become a bonafide classic, from the title track - which finds Maria, arms outstretched, spinning in euphoria - to Climb Every Mountain, the inspiration closer. In between, there's My Favorite Things, an ode to joyful list-making, Do-Re-Mi, a veritable music lesson, and The Lonely Goatherd, a lyrical tongue twister if there ever was one. And let's not forget the fact that most people think Edelweiss is an actual Austrian folk song, and not a brilliant creation of Rodgers and Hammerstein. There's an air of abject wholesomeness that pervades all of the music - which led Pauline Kael to controversially say, we have been turned into emotional and aesthetic imbeciles when we hear ourselves humming the sickly, goody-goody songs - but delve into the subtext of Hammerstein's lyrics and you'll find slight shades of passion, and even sex, as when eldest daughter Liesl (Charmian Carr) sings, I am sixteen, going on seventeen, innocent as a rose. Since when were the delicate, sensual petals of a rose considered innocent? Still, this is family-friendly stuff all around, and while it may be overly sweet, I don't think it's fair to say it's sickeningly so. Not every film needs to be a gritty, philosophically loaded, emotionally exhausting drama.

The Sound of Music is, at the very least, well-made fluff, but it's frequently much more than that. The film is exhilarating from the first frames, as Director Robert Wise takes us on an aerial tour of the Alps, culminating in a helicopter shot that swoops down on a twirling Julie Andrews right as she erupts into song. Wise has a keen sense of mise-en-scène, and all of his compositions emphasize depth and movement, particularly his arrangements of the seven von Trapp children. The kids themselves come across as precocious, but never obnoxious, and when Christopher Plummer's steely eyes soften at the sound of their singing, even the most hardened moviegoer is likely to break into an insuppressible smile or even shed a tear. The movie is essentially engineered to make you feel good, to make your heart swell, and whether or not you think this is manipulative or superficial, it's certainly effective. I can think of few better cures for the blues than spending 174 minutes with The Sound of Music. Yes, at nearly three hours long - thanks to reprises of just about every song - the film would seem to run the risk of sagging in the middle, but it surprisingly never does, floating along instead on its own glee-filled effervescence. And the source of this bubbly propulsion is Julie Andrews, who practically radiates joy and goodness. It's easy, maybe even fashionable among critics, to dislike The Sound of Music, but we could all stand to be a little bit more like Maria, waltzing, whistling, and singing our way through life.

Labels: biography, Cinderella-story, drama, Eleanor Parker, family, musical, romance


Where the Boys Are (1960) [NR] ****


A film review by Michael Reuben for blu-ray.com on July 27, 2017.

Where the Boys Are appeared in 1960, the same year as the setting for the 2007 opening season of TV's Mad Men, and both are time capsules of the manners and mores of a bygone era. The difference is that Mad Men reinvented that time with an often ironic awareness of what would follow it, whereas Where the Boys Are represents its age without detachment. Adapted from a popular novel by Glendon Swarthout (who also wrote The Shootist), the film was billed as a teen comedy, one of the first, and it helped spawn an entire sub-genre of beach-themed entertainments, including the Beach Party series starring Frankie Avalon and Annette Funicello.

But Where the Boys Are had something more serious on its mind, which is why it plays today as an uneasy mixture of broad farce and romantic melodrama. In an era when the Hays Code still strait-jacketed filmmakers from dealing honestly with sexual relations, Where the Boys Are used humor and euphemism to bypass screen taboos. If much of the film's creative circumlocution seems quaint today, it's largely because Where the Boys Are anatomizes a template of morality that, within just a few years, would be shredded by the sexual revolution of the Sixties. It's worth noting that the film's year of release was also the first year that birth control pills became widely available, thereby transforming the female sexual calculus on which the Where the Boys Are plot largely depends.

The Warner Archive Collection has remastered Where the Boys Are for Blu-ray with a new transfer that showcases director Henry Levin's (Journey to the Center of the Earth) widescreen compositions and location photography. With its (now) politically incorrect depictions of good girls vs. bad, the film is a fascinating museum piece, enlivened by lead performances that include the screen debuts of singer Connie Francis and newcomer Paula Prentiss, who would go on to become a familiar figure in both film and TV, equally famous for her talents as a comedienne and her durable marriage to actor/director (and sometime co-star) Richard Benjamin.

Where the Boys Are traces the adventures of four freshman women who depart their snowy campus up north for spring break on the Florida beaches of Ft. Lauderdale, because that's where the boys are. Over the course of a frenetic week, the foursome experience adventures that are sometimes comic, sometimes romantic and sometimes traumatic. Meanwhile, the population of their cut-rate motel room expands every night, as they continue to take in penniless students and strays.

The film establishes its relationship issues in an early classroom scene where Merritt Andrews (Dolores Hart) offers an impromptu class presentation on premarital sex - or, in the carefully chosen word of the Where the Boys Are script, emotional involvement and playing house. Merritt scandalizes her teacher, whose ironic name is Dr. Raunch (Amy Douglass), and thrills the entire class by acknowledging what all of them already know, which is that girls are now expected to indulge their boyfriends' desires and those who withhold their favors quickly become unpopular. Still, when Merritt and her friends reach Florida, she struggles to remain a good girl, and the story rewards her with the catch of the season in the person of Ryder Smith (George Hamilton), a Princeton legacy and heir who sweeps Merritt off her feet, but not into bed, with his good looks and charm - not to mention his yacht, mansion and butler. Merritt's friend, Melanie Tolman (Yvette Mimieux), takes the opposite approach, throwing herself into the holiday spirit, drinking to the point of collapse and dating a revolving door of Ivy Leaguers (or so they say) with whom, we are meant to infer, she shares a different bed every night. Where Merritt is rewarded for being good, Melanie is ultimately punished for being bad, and the film treats her punishment as unfortunate but deserved. (If you can't take date rape in stride, Where the Boys Are isn't the film for you.)

The group's other two members endure more comfortingly comic romantic entanglements. Angie (Connie Francis) finds herself attached to an eccentric musician named Basil (Frank Gorshin), whose band plays dialectic jazz and who doesn't begin to notice the diminutive co-ed until she opens her mouth to sing and the voice of Connie Francis emerges. (Producer Joe Pasternak actively recruited the singer for the role, even though she was more interested in continuing her successful recording and touring career.) The exceptionally tall Tuggle Carpenter (Paula Prentiss) is paired with an even taller admirer whose name is equally unlikely: TV Thompson (Jim Hutton), so dubbed because he aspires to work in television, which may explain why he delivers every sentence as if he were speaking into a microphone. TV routinely bemoans his lack of success with women, but Tuggle sees in him a candidate to help her achieve her life's ambition, which is to become a married baby-making machine. (One wonders why she's bothering with college.) The budding relationship hits a snag when Tuggle refuses to sleep with TV - it's one of the film's most overt sexual negotiations - and the disappointed suitor finds his attention straying to a big-chested platinum blonde nightclub performer with the appropriately seductive name of Lola Fandango (Barbara Nichols, aka Queen of the B Movies).

Where the Boys Are maintains a light-hearted tone throughout most of its running time, effectively exemplified by Ft. Lauderdale's beleaguered police captain (Chill Wills), who warns his officers to expect anything and to maintain a sense of humor because you're gonna need it if you want to survive! Routine police broadcasts dispatching law enforcement to the latest scene of student excess provide a humorous narration, much like the loudspeaker announcements in M.A.S.H. TV's brief dalliance with the pneumatic Ms. Fandango results in a slapstick disaster that lands most of the group in police custody, from which Lola extricates them with a classic dumb blonde plea. But then, in its final twenty minutes, Where the Boys Are turns deadly serious - and it also reveals the prudish underpinnings of the sexual teases that have been propelling the film. As it turns out, talking about sex is a perfectly safe pursuit for an educated young woman in the world of Where the Boys Are, but actually doing it places her in mortal peril. Indeed, Where the Boys Are appears to endorse the view that bad girls who let men take liberties forfeit both their dignity and the right to say no. It's a jarring turn in a film that bills itself as a frothy romantic comedy, and the fact that no one in 1960 seems to have noticed the dissonance says as much about the era as the script's squeaky clean language and chaste onscreen kisses. When it's not busy clowning around, Where the Boys Are plays less like an entertainment and more like an artifact of an ancient civilization. It belongs in the Smithsonian. [Reuben’s rating: 6.7 out of 10]

Blogger’s comment: I totally agree with the reviewer. I view Where the Boys Are as a time capsule of the social and sexual mores, language, makeup, costumes and sets of 1959-60. There’s even a one-second glimpse of a late 1950s Mercedes-Benz 300SL Gullwing coupe at the 47 minute mark of the film. And it was a treat to see George Hamilton, Jim Hutton (father of actor Timothy Hutton), Paula Prentiss, Dolores Hart, and especially Yvette Mimieux, who’s almost exactly six months older than I am, whom I’ve also seen in The Time Machine (1960) and The Black Hole (1979) among other films, and whom I remember as my major celebrity crush of 1960-61 – sixty years ago.

Labels: college, comedy, drama, Fifties, romance, Sixties