Pages

Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Maestro (2023) [R] ****

A film review by James Berardinelli for ReelViews.net Dec. 15, 2023.



Maestro falls prey to the most common flaw of many bio-pics: trying to encapsulate too much material (over long span of time) into a 2-hour running time. The result is that some sequences seem rushed and compressed, character relationships evolve erratically, and there are narrative gaps resulting from the necessary fast-forwards. Nevertheless, despite the limitations placed upon this approach, Bradley Cooper’s telling of Leonard Bernstein’s life story (warts and all) contains moments of cinematic passion and poetry that make the whole thing worth seeing, even if specific choices create an underlying sense of frustration.

Maestro
covers a whopping 45 years of Bernstein’s life, beginning in 1943 as he conducts the New York Philharmonic for the first time and ending in 1988 as he contemplates his own mortality but acknowledges his continuing love for making music. The film focuses on three aspects of his personality: Bernstein the musician, Bernstein the conflicted husband, and Bernstein the closeted homosexual. His love and affection for his wife, actress Felicia Montealegre (Carey Mulligan), are genuine but, although they have sex (as evidenced by the births of three children), there’s no passion. Bernstein has numerous dalliances with male partners. Felicia is aware of his infidelities and tolerates them as long as he is discreet – something that’s not always the case. When he’s composing or conducting, however, he throws himself fully into his work.

Cooper’s
greatest hits approach diminishes the characters’ emotional complexity. Relationships change during the spaces between scenes and it can be difficult to catch up. Bernstein’s feelings for Felicia are mercurial and it can be difficult to understand why she, a proud and independent woman, puts up with him. There are some memorable scenes – a tender scene during their courtship, a bitter Thanksgiving Day argument, Bernstein conducting the London Symphony Orchestra for Mahler's Symphony No. 2 Resurrection at the Ely Cathedral – but the missing ingredient is the connective tissue.

Cooper has elected to present the movie using credible facsimiles of popular filmmaking styles of the associated eras. The early portions of
Maestro, which focus on the 1940s and early 1950s, are represented in black & white with the Academy 1.33:1 aspect ratio. Actors are filmed with the gauzy, glamorous look of the time – Carey Mulligan’s first appearance is that of a movie star. By the late 1960s and 1970s, Cooper opts for the American indie style, keeping the 1.33:1 aspect ratio while trading in the black and white for color. When the timeline gets into the 1980s, the picture expands to widescreen. It’s an evocative and mostly effective way to move the story across the 45-year span it encompasses.

Maestro
features two powerhouse performances and strong support from secondary players like Sarah Silverman, Maya Hawke (looking a lot like her mother, Uma Thurman), Matt Bomer, and Tim Rogan. As Bernstein, Cooper has chosen to alter his appearance, using prosthetics, to closely resemble that of the late composer. Because the makeup work is top-notch, Cooper never looks like a man wearing a mask and the aging process seems natural. In order to achieve maximum verisimilitude, the actor studied his subject tirelessly and spent years working on imitative conducting. His efforts pay off in the London Symphony Orchestra/Mahler's Symphony No. 2 Resurrection performance, which was done live in one take – a 6 ½ minute scene during which Bernstein explodes off the screen. Carey Mulligan is somewhat hampered by the limitations of the screenplay to bring Felicia alive but some of her scenes are emotionally true.

I can’t help but wonder whether
Maestro might have worked better as a mini-series. The movie struggles with scope with some choices seemingly made with an understanding that the length was capped at around two hours. There’s less of Bernstein the musician than I expected. Outside of his first time conducting in 1943 and the 1973 Resurrection performance, his professional triumphs mostly occur off-screen so the movie can focus on his crumbling marriage and dalliances with various men. There’s plenty of good material here but also a sense that a better-tuned focus might have yielded a stronger characterization. Although not as openly crowd-pleasing as Cooper’s A Star Is Born remake, there are enough interesting touches in the film – both in its aesthetic and some of the individual scenes – to demonstrate Cooper’s evolution as a filmmaker. [Berardinelli’s rating: 3 stars out of 4]

Labels: biography, drama, music
IMDb 72/100 
MetaScore (critics=77, viewers=65) 
RottenTomatoes Averages (critics=75, viewers=88)
Netflix 
Berardinelli’s review 



No comments:

Post a Comment