Pages

Wednesday, November 20, 2019

The Thomas Crown Affair (1968) [PG] ****


A film review by James Berardinelli for ReelViews.net in 1999.

Sexual chemistry - that's what it's all about. Despite a competent caper plot and some interesting visual flourishes by director Norman Jewison, the real attraction of The Thomas Crown Affair is the relationship between Steve McQueen's title character and Faye Dunaway's Vicky Anderson. These two steam up the screen without revealing much flesh; when they're together, it's almost impossible to remember that the film purports to be about a masterfully executed, daring daylight bank robbery. And, while it's unfair to claim that no one really cares about that aspect of the production, once McQueen and Dunaway start their mating dance, it's undoubtedly a secondary concern.

The casting of McQueen and Dunaway was an inspired, if unorthodox, choice. At the time of filming in 1967, McQueen was at the top of his career, having already appeared in a pair of action-oriented classics, The Magnificent Seven and The Great Escape. Despite being cast against type, McQueen's matinee good looks and cool demeanor enabled him to get by as a suave, well dressed, highly educated criminal mastermind (part his success in the role can be attributed to the director, who kept urging McQueen to play the part like Cary Grant). Dunaway was relatively new to the screen, but, bolstered by her work in her debut feature, Bonnie and Clyde, she became Jewison's first choice. In both looks and acting, Dunaway matched McQueen - icy, serene, and stunning to gaze at. Neither gives a career performance here (in fact, both have moments of awkwardness), but the way they connect more than makes up for any acting deficiencies.

Everything in The Thomas Crown Affair is a game, from the way the characters interact with each other to the way the director toys with the audience. As far as crime caper films go, this one has a relatively lighthearted tone, at least up until the end when an expected betrayal and a surprise twist leaves the viewer with a bittersweet taste. Jewison has described the movie as possessing a European flavor and admits to having been influenced by the French New Wave. Nowhere is this more obvious than during the last scene. (It's worth noting that 30 years and dozens of caper films later, the closing twist isn't nearly as startling as it once was, but it still makes for an effective conclusion.)

Thomas Crown is one of Boston's wealthiest citizens, yet he has a passion for crime. He masterminds an audacious and meticulously plotted bank robbery not because he needs the money, but because he delights in attacking the establishment. For Thomas, beating the authorities is a game, and the cash is just the tangible proof that he won. For this heist, he has recruited seven men who don't know each other, given them precise instructions, then waited to pick up the money. Things go without a hitch, and Thomas is $2,660,527 richer (less the cuts he pays to his hired hands). But the bank's insurance company isn't willing to swallow the bill without a thorough investigation, so they put their best agent, Vicky Anderson, on the case. She joins Boston Police Detective Eddy Malone (Paul Burke), who is already hard at work tracking down leads. Vicky decides to toy with Thomas, meeting him, letting him know who she is and what she's after, and attempting to trick him into making a mistake. But Thomas, aware of what she's up to, calculates his every move. The attraction between them proves to be too much to resist and they end up doing the most unwise thing either could imagine: falling in love.

There is suspense in The Thomas Crown Affair, especially in relation to the question of whether Vicky will turn in Thomas, but it takes a back seat to the romantic tension, which Jewison wisely elevates to the boiling point during an unforgettable chess match filled with long glances, lingering close-ups, and obvious sexual imagery. (For example, Vicky can be seen stroking the head of a bishop while contemplating a move.) That scene - six and one-half minutes with only three brief lines of dialogue - ends in a 70 second kiss that dissolves into a blur of colors. It is one of cinema's most intensely erotic moments, due in large part to Jewison's directing, McQueen and Dunaway's silent acting, Hal Ashby's editing, and Michel Legrand's memorable score (Legrand, who wrote the music for The Umbrellas of Cherbourg, almost tops his work for that film here).

The film is structured in layers, with games built upon games. Vicky refers to this overtly on one occasion, noting that Thomas has won round three, but, for the most part, their victories and losses are unspoken. And we're never sure who the cat is, and who the mouse is. Thomas is playing against everyone --Vicky, the Boston Police, and himself. Vicky's game offers a more personal risk, because there's no way she can win. By defeating Thomas, she loses him. But, for her, surrender is not an option. There are few scenes during The Thomas Crown Affair when the characters let down their guard. Only when they're on the beach, racing across the sand in Thomas' dune buggy, do they appear completely at ease. For the audience, the heist scenes gain an extra level of tension because of our personal investment in the relationship. These characters are amoral, but we recognize they were made for each other, and hope that, somehow, they can end up together.

Jewison has described The Thomas Crown Affair as a victory of style over substance, and, in many ways, he's right. The script (by first-time screenwriter Alan R. Trustman, a former Boston lawyer) is light on dialogue, allowing Jewison and his cinematographer, veteran Haskell Wexler (with whom he had worked on his previous feature, In the Heat of the Night), to use a variety of sites and approaches to develop a powerful sense of atmosphere. Wexler experiments throughout The Thomas Crown Affair, turning in several unique and memorable shots. On one occasion, we see a character's face through a series of empty phone booths that makes it appear as if he's in a glass tunnel. During the initial crime, one of the robbers throws a flare and the camera skates behind it as it slides across the floor, trailing red smoke. Wexler also makes frequent use of reflections in mirrors and glass.

Perhaps the most innovative aspect of The Thomas Crown Affair is the use of multiple screens during the heist sequence. On several occasions, as many as six or seven separate images appear on the screen at the same time, each showing a different character. It's an effective way of cramming a lot of information into one frame, and, since it is used sparingly, it's unlikely to confuse the average viewer. Jewison has stated that he was compelled to use this technique after viewing Christopher Chapman's 17-minute short, A Place to Stand.

However, while style may be an important aspect of The Thomas Crown Affair, the real reason we're drawn into this deliciously decadent world is the mesmerizing chemistry that smolders between McQueen and Dunaway. Those who search for a recent example of this kind of interaction need look no further than Out of Sight, which developed a similar dynamic between George Clooney and Jennifer Lopez. The Thomas Crown Affair is a rare motion picture where the plot works just well enough to allow us to enjoy the character interplay without being distracted by obvious gaffes and logical errors. [Berardinelli’s rating: 3.5 out of 4 stars = 87.5/100]

Blogger’s comment: Steve McQueen was born in 1930, so he was 37 when this film was shot in 1967, although he looks ten years older. Thirteen years later, at the age of fifty, McQueen died of cancer in Juarez, Mexico in 1980.

I much prefer the 1999 remake with Pierce Brosnan and Rene Russo, which is a stronger film in both style and substance. My only criticism with the remake is that the act of stealing the painting and folding it into a briefcase would have split the wooden frame, damaging and possibly destroying the painting.

Labels: crime, drama, romance, Sixties, thriller

Berardinelli's original review

Top Gun: Maverick (2022) [PG-13] *****

A film review by James Berardinelli for ReelViews.net on May 22, 2022.


Top Gun: Maverick is one of those rare breeds: a sequel that’s better than the original. Due in part to the passage of 36 years in between installments, the second film arrives with a less glossy, more serious approach. Cold war rah-rah machismo has been replaced by a more reflective (although no less action-oriented) attitude. Tom Cruise, playing the title character, has supplanted toothy cockiness with a weathered, nuanced performance. In Top Gun, he was preening. Here, he’s acting. The differences extend to the screenplay (credited to Ehren Kruger, Eric Warren Singer, and Cruise’s current favorite collaborator, Christopher McQuarrie), which is less testosterone-drenched, to the tone, which is more grounded, to the technical elements, which are cutting-edge. The kernels in this popcorn crowd-pleaser frequently aren’t as frequently scalded or unpopped as in the original.

Top Gun: Maverick is selling nostalgia while at the same time remembering that younger viewers might not care about a movie that came out when their parents were kids. Although it’s possible to enjoy this movie on its own terms, it understandably works better for those who have seen (and remember) the 1986 box office king. Easter eggs and callbacks abound, even though only two actors – Cruise and Val Kilmer – have returned. At times, Top Gun: Maverick seems like a loose remake. The opening sequence, complete with Kenny Loggin’s Danger Zone, is a carbon copy, and many of the key notes are similar (although modernized). The shirtless volleyball game of the original has been updated to a shirtless football match (although the women are allowed to keep their tops on) and is edited in such a way as to tone down the homoerotic undercurrent.

Story-wise, the movie calls back not only to Top Gun but to a blockbuster from a decade prior: Star Wars. Top Gun: Maverick’s climax, which features an attack by a group of fighters on a secure uranium processing plant, is taken almost beat-for-beat from the Death Star run in Star Wars, right down to the need to navigate a narrow trench and bullseye a shaft. One can be forgiven expecting to hear a ghostly voice intone, Use the Force, Maverick as the moment approaches.


When the movie opens, we catch up with Captain Pete Maverick Mitchell in his current job as a test pilot for new and experimental aircraft. As Mitchell’s current superior, Admiral Chester Cain (Ed Harris), tersely notes, drones will soon make pilots extinct. He then transfers the insubordinate officer to the Navy’s fighter training program (a.k.a. Top Gun) as ordered by the Commander of the Pacific Fleet, Admiral Tom Iceman Kazansky (Val Kilmer). Iceman believes that Maverick has the qualities necessary to prepare an elite group of pilots for a top-secret, potentially suicidal mission. Maverick’s new bosses, Admiral Beau Simpson (Jon Hamm) and Admiral Solomon Bates (Charles Parnell), are skeptical. Complicating matters for Maverick is the presence of Lt. Rooster Bradshaw (Miles Teller) in the group. The son of the deceased Goose Bradshaw, Rooster holds a mammoth grudge against his new instructor. Maverick is also given cause to regret how he treated an old flame, Penny Benjamin (Jennifer Connelly), but finds her willing to re-ignite the flame.


As was the case in the first movie, there are too many secondary characters for any of them to achieve anything resembling three-dimensionality but at least in this case they have enough defining characteristics to avoid them seeming like a lineup of doppelgangers. One, Glen Powell’s Hangman, is an Iceman clone. Another, Monica Barbaro’s Phoenix, is the first female pilot of the Top Gun universe. And Lewis’ Pullman’s Bob isn’t just a nerd – he’s a nerd who looks like a nerd, not a buffed jock who says he’s a nerd.


One of my complaints with the original Top Gun was that the aerial scenes weren’t as well-choreographed, shot, and presented as one might have expected. Director Joseph Kosinski has corrected these issues. Top Gun: Maverick’s in-air sequences are always coherent, often exciting, and occasionally breathtaking. Some of this is the result of better technology but some is simply that Kosinski is a better fit for the material than Tony Scott was in 1986. The in-cockpit cameras give the viewer a you-are-there feeling and the decision to limit the use of computer effects avoids the artificiality that sometimes results from CGI reliance.


Still, as eye-popping as the dogfights and aerial maneuvers are, the centerpiece scene (and the one that will have the greatest meaning for Top Gun fans) is a simple one-on-one meeting between Maverick and Iceman. With the screenplay overlaying elements of actor Val Kilmer’s real-life struggle with throat cancer onto the story of Admiral Kazansky, the movie achieves something powerful and deeply moving in that scene. The subtext makes it about much more than a reunion between two rivals-turned-friends. The appearance was meaningful enough to Kilmer to coax him temporarily out of retirement. If it represents the final punctuation mark on a remarkably successful career, it would be difficult to envision a better ending.


It remains to be seen whether Top Gun: Maverick will be able to attract new fans with a fervor to match the older ones who are approaching this movie with the eagerness of a 36-year buildup. Cruise, the A-list marquee-topper who never gives less than 100% to any production, once again illustrates how he has managed to remain relevant over an amazing four-decade span when so many of his contemporaries have faded away. And, although Top Gun: Maverick is surely relying on some of the alchemy that made the formula successful in 1986, the film’s awareness of cultural and technological shifts in the interim has made for a more complete cinematic experience. This is unquestionably a production to be experienced on a big screen; resizing it for a television or tablet will diminish some of the most extravagant aspects, limiting suspense although not eviscerating the storytelling elements. [Berardinelli’s rating: 3 stars out of 4 = 75%]


Labels: action, drama, flying

IMDb 84/100

MetaScore (critics=78, viewers=73)

RottenTomatoes Averages (critics=82, viewers=98)

Blu-ray