Pages

Showing posts with label Matt Damon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Matt Damon. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 17, 2020

Ford v Ferrari (2019) [PG-13] *****

A film review by James Berardinelli for ReelViews.net on Nov. 14, 2019.

It’s said that the sports movie format works best when telling a true story. Director James Mangold, after having spent some time in the X-Men universe (he helmed both The Wolverine and Logan), has returned to the real world to direct two A-list stars, Matt Damon and Christian Bale, in a story of a different kind of heroism. When it comes to sports movies, race car driving is an underrepresented field, primarily because the act of sitting in a car careening around a track for lap after lap after lap isn’t inherently cinematic. Recognizing this, Mangold limits the racing sequences in Ford v Ferrari to the minimum necessary to ensure audience involvement and divides the focus equally between the sports elements and those faced by the characters when developing and building the cars.

The movie is loosely based on the true story of how Henry Ford II (Tracy Letts) entered into a racing rivalry with Enzo Ferrari (Remo Girone) that culminated in showdowns at the 1965 and 1966 Le Mans. Various factual events have been changed to enhance the drama. Faced with the enormous undertaking of competing against perennial winner Ferrari, Ford tasks executives Lee Iacocca (Jon Bernthal) and Leo Beebe (Josh Lucas) to hire former Le Mans winner Carroll Shelby (Matt Damon) to design a race car. (Note: This is same Lee Iacocca who would revive Chrysler’s fortunes during the 1980s and become a household name by doing so.) When he is given a blank check for the work, Shelby agrees. His team includes Roy Lunn (JJ Field), Phil Remington (Ray McKinnon), and the brilliant but difficult British driver, Ken Miles (Christian Bale). Miles’ irascibility and perceived anti-team attitude earn him Beebe’s ire and he persuades Ford to limit Miles’ involvement to development and test driving. Of course, this being a sports movie, we know that’s not how things are going to end.

Mangold takes Ford v Ferrari out of the simple realm of the genre without entirely losing the vibe. We still have the buildup/training scenes in which the participants prepare for the big contest. We still have a preliminary bout in which the central figure shows his worth. And we still have the showdown. But, although the climax satisfies, it does so in an unconventional fashion. And, in the end, one can make a compelling argument that the true villain isn’t Ferrari or the driver of car #21 but Henry Ford II or his gutless corporate shill, Beebe.

The chemistry between Damon and Bale is solid – an effective meshing of oil and vinegar. Damon is suave, smart, and easy-going. Bale is angry and intense. The best scene featuring the two of them occurs when they engage in a fist-fight outside Miles’ home while his unconcerned wife, Mollie (Caitriona Balfe), pulls up a lawn chair to spectate. It’s one of a number of comedy-tinged scenes. Although Mangold culls the expected tension from the racing scenes, he’s not above going for the funny bone. Witness what happens when Shelby takes Mr. Ford for a little ride. Tracy Letts’ reaction is priceless.

Ford v Ferrari has a pacing issue. While gearheads, racing fans, and some engineers may disagree, the movie goes too deep into the nuts & bolts. There’s too much about the minutia of designing and building the cars. Although the racing scenes are bracing, with just enough first-person, through-the-dashboard shots to give the audience a you are there perspective, there are dead spots in between. This isn’t the first time in 2019 that I’ve felt a movie could have been improved by some judicious cutting. We have reached a point in film evolution where the Extended DVD Director’s Cut has become the theatrical release.

I admire the ways in which Mangold has broadened the sports movie without sacrificing the integrity of its essential elements. There’s a lot more in this production than what one often uncovers in the genre with its elements of corporate greed and the buddy film sideshow. Don’t be put off by the lackluster title. This is solid, middle-of-the-road entertainment. Slow patches aside, it finishes strong and, although it probably won’t win the box office race, it may generate some Oscar interest (because Bale is almost always good enough to warrant that sort of attention). [Berardinelli’s rating: 3 out of 4 stars = 75%]

Blogger’s comment: Ford v Ferrari won Oscars for Best Film Editing and Best Sound Editing.

Labels: action, auto-racing, biography, drama, Ferrari, history, Matt Damon, Sixties, sport


The Bourne Supremacy (2004) [PG-13] ****

A film review by James Berardinelli for ReelViews.net


The Bourne Supremacy
is a serviceable thriller - no more, no less. This may come as a disappointment to those anticipating something on the same level as the surprise hit 2002 movie, The Bourne Identity. Sadly, the cinematic second installment of Robert Ludlum's trilogy falls short of its predecessor in almost every area, except perhaps acting. There's nothing wrong with any of the performances in this movie; it's just that the actors aren't as important as they were two years ago. Action has moved to the fore, shouldering aside plot and character development in order to maintain the frantic pace that director Paul Greengrass believes is necessary to retain his audience's attention.

The Bourne Supremacy
opens two years after The Bourne Identity closed, with Jason Bourne (Matt Damon) having settled down with his girlfriend, Marie (Franka Potente) in the state of Goa, India. Now, it appears someone with the worst of intentions has found them. Not only is a killer (Karl Urban) tasked with killing Bourne, but he is framed for the murder of a CIA agent in Berlin. This brings the agency back into the picture. The find Bourne team is led by Pamela Landy (Joan Allen) and Bourne's old boss, Ward Abbott (Brian Cox). Thinking that the CIA is behind the attempt on his life, Bourne decides he has no choice but to track down the people trying to kill him and eliminate them, thus fulfilling the promise he had made near the end of The Bourne Identity.

At its heart,
The Bourne Supremacy is a revenge action thriller. There's nothing more subtle or deeper going on here, although there is a secondary plot about a group of Russians. Character development is perfunctory. We learn a few more things about Bourne's past, and he shows signs of a conscience. However, he was more interesting in the last film, when he was foundering to discover who he was. This time around, Bourne is just a relentless killer, at least until the final 30 minutes, when he displays more compassion than we expect (or, in some ways, prefer).

After the initial 15 minutes of exposition,
The Bourne Supremacy unfolds as a series of long chase and fight sequences. Some of these are more compelling than others. The final chase, in particular, is involving. Coming as late in the movie as it does, there's a sense that it will lead to a resolution rather than the usual oops, I lost him. There are plenty of instances of hand-to-hand combat, and that's where the choice of Greengrass becomes questionable. The director of The Bourne Identity, Doug Liman, was able to present the fight scenes in a clear, no-frills fashion. In The Bourne Supremacy, there are so many cuts and edits that the fights devolve into an incoherent mess. It's better not to try to follow them when they're going on - just wait until they're over to see who's left standing.

On a number of levels,
The Bourne Supremacy isn't as satisfying as The Bourne Identity. The culmination of Bourne's revenge spree against the agency, while it accomplishes the task, doesn't offer a good sense of closure. And the fact that Bourne spends most of the movie on his own eliminates the nice give-and-take between Bourne and Marie that helped make The Bourne Identity better than a generic espionage flick. Not having read Ludlum's novel, I can't assess whether the problem is in the source material or in Tony Gilroy's adaptation, but The Bourne Supremacy is less intelligent than its predecessor.

In the title role, Damon again proves that he has the makeup to be a decent action hero. He's more in the mold of a Mel Gibson or a Harrison Ford than an Arnold Schwarzenegger, but there's room in the genre for all kinds of actors. Brian Cox is suitably oily as the bad CIA guy, whose role has been expanded from the first film. Joan Allen brushes up on her ice queen image to give Bourne a more formidable agency adversary than Abbott. There are also brief appearances from familiar faces Franka Potente and
Julia Stiles, as well as a small-but-important part for Oksana Akinshina as the orphaned daughter of the Russian couple Bourne killed in his first project.

Although
The Bourne Supremacy disappoints relative to expectations established by The Bourne Identity, it's neither unwatchable nor uninteresting. The continuity is strong (essentially everyone except the director is the same) and the lead character, while not as compelling this time around, is still worth rooting for. Plus, there's enough action to camouflage the thinness of the plot. Still, it's discouraging to encounter another sequel that can't live up to the standard established by its predecessor. [Berardinelli’s rating: 2.5 stars (62.5 out of 100)]

Labels: action, Julia Stiles, Matt Damon, mystery, spy, thriller
IMDb 77/100
MetaScore (critics=73, viewers=89) 
RottenTomatoes Averages (critics=72, viewers=83) 
Blu-ray 

 

Tuesday, June 16, 2020

The Bourne Ultimatum (2007) [PG-13] ****/*****

A film review by James Berardinelli for ReelViews.net.


If nothing else,
The Bourne Ultimatum represents the best of 2007's inordinately high number of so-called threequels. Hopefully, that's not damning with faint praise. The Bourne Ultimatum, the third in the movie trilogy loosely based on Robert Ludlum's novels, is superior to its immediate predecessor but not quite as good as the original. The action is this movie is top-notch (despite the spastic camera) - full of suspense and kinetic energy - but the film doesn't have as much heart or emotional depth as The Bourne Identity. As with The Bourne Supremacy, this movie diverts so far from its source material that the only things retained from Ludlum's novel are the title and some of the character names. (Shades of how the James Bond movie producers approached many of Ian Fleming's books.) Ludlum's version of The Bourne Ultimatum is completely different from the one penned by Tony Gilroy and directed by Paul Greengrass.

The film moves so fast there's almost no time to breathe. Although the plot may at first seem convoluted, it's actually fairly straightforward. Jason Bourne (
Matt Damon), as part of his ongoing quest to discover his true identity, once again becomes a danger to the CIA. So the department's black ops division, led by Noah Vosen (David Strathairn), targets him for elimination. Also conspiring against him is the agency's director, Ezra Kramer (Scott Glenn), but Bourne has allies as well: agents Pamela Landy (Joan Allen) and Nicky Parsons (Julia Stiles) endanger their careers and lives to help him.

The Bourne Ultimatum
globe hops with the best of its genre: Moscow, Paris, London, Madrid, Tangier, and New York. Bourne is always on the move, sometimes acting as the hunter and sometimes being the quarry (and often both at the same time). One could argue it's a little exhausting, but the action is consistently excellent - if only the same thing could be same could be said of the manner in which Greengrass has chosen to film it. Looking back on The Bourne Identity, it's easy to be impressed by the clarity with which Doug Liman directed the action sequences. Greengrass, on the other hand, prefers fast cuts and an unsteady camera. Even during static shots (such as a simple conversation with close-ups), it's as if the cameraman has Parkinson's. Things aren't as bad here as in 28 Weeks Later, but there are brief instances when the inability to figure out what's going on diminishes the effectiveness of the action. Still, it's hard to deny that Greengrass' approach generates intensity.

There are two standout sequences. Tension is enhanced in both because not only is Bourne trying to outthink and outflank the bad guys, but he's also responsible for protecting someone else. In the first one, he and a reporter for The Guardian, Simon Ross (
Paddy Considine), are trapped by enemy operatives in London's Waterloo Station. The second involves a chase through the roads and across the rooftops of Tangier as Bourne attempts to intercept a key contact who has knowledge of his past while keeping himself and Nicky alive.

Matt Damon once again plays Bourne perfectly - it's a largely impassive, kick-ass performance that draws the viewer in. Bourne doesn't delight in killing, but he doesn't shy away from it, either. There's a kinship one can sense between him and the newest James Bond. Julia Stiles and Joan Allen get a chance to show softer sides of their hard-edged characters. In the past, both played Bourne's adversaries; here, they're his allies. David Strathairn, the excellent character actor who is favored by John Sayles, oozes white collar menace.
Albert Finney's inclusion in the cast may confuse viewers with imperfect memories because he looks a lot like Brian Cox, who was in the other two movies.

When it comes to action,
The Bourne Ultimatum trumps the summer's other offerings. While its stunts are no less preposterous than those in Live Free or Die Hard (in fact, both films feature flying cars), what The Bourne Ultimatum offers is grittier and more visceral. And, while there are fewer special effects here, The Bourne Ultimatum provides a lot more suspense and tension than Transformers could hope for. [Berardinelli’s rating: 3 stars out of 4, 75%]

Labels: action, Julia Stiles, Matt Damon, mystery, spy, thriller
IMDb 80/100
MetaScore (critics=85, viewers=76) 
RottenTomatoes Averages (critics=80, viewers=85) 
Blu-ray 

 

Downsizing (2017) [R] ***

A film review by James Berardinelli for ReelViews.net on Dec. 22, 2017.

For a movie about small people, Downsizing certainly thinks big… too big, perhaps. Director/co-writer Alexander Payne has done such a good job of world-building that there are far too many ideas, subplots, and opportunities for one two-hour film to contain and the sense of truncation becomes constraining. (A TV/streaming mini-series à la Westworld might have been perfect.) Unfortunately, the primary story Downsizing elects to follow turns out to be rather unremarkable. The character arc of Paul Safranek (Matt Damon) lacks verve and, although some will appreciate the low-key denouement, the film as a whole exudes unfulfilled potential and the ending provokes little more than a shrug of the shoulders. I cared less about the resolution of Paul’s story than was needed for the movie to succeed.

The movie opens at an unspecified future date. Scientists in Norway, having determined that overpopulation is the greatest threat facing humankind, devise a way to miniaturize living creatures. Five years later, a pioneer team, led by Dr. Jorgen Asbjornsen (Rolf Lassgard), have set up a commune for small people. It becomes a major news story and, when we first meet Paul at an Omaha bar, he is amazed. Ten years into the future, downsizing, as the process has become known, is an increasingly popular option for cash-strapped middle-class citizens seeking to stretch their money. Although scientists initially envisioned downsizing as an environmentally friendly lifestyle (a five-inch person has a vastly smaller carbon footprint than a full-sized individual), one dollar in the big world is worth orders of magnitude more in the small one. So many people are transitioning in order to lead a life of luxury.

Paul and his wife, Audrey (Kristen Wiig), decided to make a plunge when their mortgage application is rejected due to a poor earnings-to-debt ratio. They learn that their assets – all $150K of them – will be worth more than $12M in Leisureland. So they take the leap but, when Paul awakens, he learns that everything didn’t go as expected. Instead of living in the lap of luxury, he’s forced to rent an apartment living beneath the obnoxious Dusan Mirkovic (Christoph Waltz) and take a job for a cleaning service run by Vietnam refugee Ngoc Lan Tran (Hong Chau), who was forced by her government to undergo the downsizing process.

It would be easy enough to dismiss Downsizing as an adult version of Honey, I Shrunk the Kids, but that would be unfair. The only elements the films share is the shrinking aspect. Downsizing isn’t an adventure film – it’s a serious movie dealing with serious issues. Environmental irresponsibility and climate change are both on Payne’s mind. He also has an ax to grind about the current culture of consumerism. Downsizing, like many sci-fi/fantasy movies, is political.

The movie’s most obvious flaw – and it’s a huge one – is that, after establishing everything and introducing the characters, it doesn’t seem to know what to do with the vast canvas. So it paints a small picture, using only a fraction of the available real estate, and doesn’t do enough to engage the audience. The first 45 minutes of Downsizing are brilliant. The final 90 minutes are mediocre at best and there are times when things sputter and seem not to have a clear direction. Eventually, we figure out that Downsizing is about Paul’s existential journey, but he’s not the most dynamic of characters. The only thing that works is his relationship with Ngoc Lan Tran, and that’s in part because (despite caricature elements like her broken English) she’s a more interesting person than he is. The movie is already spinning its wheels when Payne decides to toss in an end of the world scenario. It’s either poorly thought-out or poorly explained (difficult to ascertain which is the case) and introduces a lot of head-scratching questions. The ending is muted and anti-climactic.

For Payne, whose precise, incisive efforts have included Sideways and NebraskaDownsizing may be his most serious movie to date – and his least effective. Although it doesn’t abandon satire altogether (there are biting cameos by Neil Patrick Harris and Laura Dern), most of Paul’s journey is presented without tongue in cheek. There are occasions when Payne remembers to inject a little comedy into the dialogue (one example being when two characters banter about which of the nine kinds of American fuck they had) but the initially playful tone turns dour and the preaching grows louder. This is partly intentional – the more we learn about the world of the downsized downtrodden, the more apparent it becomes that the process hasn’t wiped away class struggles and income inequality – but it’s also a result of the lack of narrative momentum.

As Downsizing progressed, I realized that I wanted to learn more about just about every character in the film except Paul. Damon’s earnestness, which was an asset in The Martian, does nothing here. He and actress Hong Chau exhibit chemistry but it’s not enough to keep Downsizing from capsizing. The fundamental miscalculation is thinking that Paul’s story is sufficiently interesting to captivate a viewer. There are some fantastic things happening in Downsizing. It’s a movie of big concepts and bigger aspirations. Unfortunately, the central character is as small figuratively as he is literally, and that limits the movie’s capacity to enthrall and engage. [Berardinelli’s rating: 2.5 out of 4 stars]

Blogger’s comment: This is an example of a good concept being turned into a mediocre screenplay. So much of this was poorly thought out. For example, what about the non-human creatures that are going to see downsized humans as prey? And while the downsized goods and services will have a reduced need for raw materials and energy, the labor input will be the same, and might arguably be higher. This was not factored into the economic equation.

Labels: comedy, drama, Matt Damon, satire, sci-fi


Monday, June 15, 2020

The Legend of Bagger Vance (2000) [PG-13] ***/****

A film review by James Berardinelli for ReelViews.net.


With
The Legend of Bagger Vance, director Robert Redford has attempted, with only limited success, to do for golf what movies like The Natural and Field of Dreams did for baseball. There are three elements at work in this film. The first is the use of the game as a metaphor for life. The second is a plunge deep into the lore of the sport, throwing away the unsavory modern trappings that have become associated with it and getting back to the purity of the game. Finally, there's the traditional sports movie storyline that culminates in a big game scenario pitting the underdog against a stronger, more experienced champion. Stirring these ingredients together as called for by the recipe should result in an engaging motion picture. Strangely, however, The Legend of Bagger Vance comes across as incomplete and uninvolving. In his zeal to get the period details right and craft a reverent, almost mystical atmosphere, Redford committed a key blunder: he lost sight of the characters' humanity. The men and women inhabiting this motion pictures are types, ciphers, and mouthpieces for slogans, not individuals we can believe in and care for.

With the exception of a framing story that transpires in modern day (and features an uncredited cameo by
Jack Lemmon as the narrator), the majority of The Legend of Bagger Vance takes place in 1928 in Savannah, Georgia. Adele Invergordon (Charlize Theron), the inheritor of her late father's golf resort, has decided to erase her debts by staging a celebrity golf exhibition with a $10,000 prize. There are to be three participants: Bobby Jones (Joel Gretsch), Walter Hagen (Bruce McGill), and a local hero, Rannulph Junuh (Matt Damon), who was once considered to be one of the country's top prospects on the links. But that was before the war, from which he returned damaged and with Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Now, Adele, who was once the love of his life, who still loves him and doesn’t understand why he has spent a decade lost and alone, must convince him to give up his drinking and start swinging the clubs again. It would be an impossible task if not for the aid of a local boy, Hardy Greaves (J. Michael Moncrief), who idolizes Junuh, and the mysterious Bagger Vance (Will Smith), who wanders into Junuh's life one night with a proposal to be his caddy for a guaranteed $5. In the process, he offers all the wisdom he possesses about golf and life.

Despite relying on several tried-and-true sports clichés,
The Legend of Bagger Vance often comes across as pretentious. Redford hammers home the connection between golf and life with a host of half-baked lines that sound like bad dialogue from a self-help book: The rhythm of the game is like the rhythm of life, Inside each and every one of us is one true authentic swing, and The golf course lives and breathes just like us. The capper is that, like life, golf is a game that can't be won, only played. All of these lessons, and many more, come out of the mouth of Bagger Vance, who is like Obi-Wan Kenobi to Junuh's Luke Skywalker. He doles out sage advice, transforming his pupil from a burnt-out drunk into a self-assured man who can face the future.

Not one of these characters has an iota of personality that wasn't clearly manufactured on a screenwriter's word processor. Other than his slogans and sunny smile, there's nothing to Bagger. For all we know, he could be an angel on vacation. We learn plenty about Junuh, but too many of his characteristics are telegraphed, and his background is pieced together via a narrative voiceover accompanied by flashbacks. In the end, he seems more like a construct than a character, and it's difficult to muster much sympathy for him. Adele is a stereotypical tough Southern woman and is used primarily for comic relief and a little romantic tension. The only one who seems remotely real is Hardy, who at least behaves in a way that is consistent with someone his age.

In his best films (such as
The Horse Whisperer and A River Runs Through It), Redford has the ability to draw an audience into the story, building invisible bonds between viewers and characters while filling the screen with sumptuous images. The Legend of Bagger Vance only gets half of the equation right. The movie consistently looks great - there are some twilight and sunset shots that are nothing short of stunning. But the character empathy simply isn't there. We don't care much about what happens to Junuh. His story may be interesting, but he isn't.

One of the questions many people have been asking is whether Will Smith, who is best known for action and comedy roles, can convincingly pull off a low-key, dramatic role (much as he did 7 years ago in
Six Degrees of Separation). The Legend of Bagger Vance does not provide an answer, since Smith is given so little to do that almost any actor (excepting the likes of a Schwarzenegger or Stallone) could have convincingly pulled it off. Likewise, neither Matt Damon nor Charlize Theron has anything to be ashamed of, but Jeremy Leven's screenplay (based on the novel by Steven Pressfield) doesn't give them enough to work with. If there's an acting standout, it's the underrated character actor Bruce McGill, who puts gusto into his portrayal of real-life golfing legend Walter Hagen. McGill's performance brings life to a movie that is too often bogged down in its attempts to raise aspects of golf to an almost-religious level (choral music is even used at one point).

Impeccably crafted movies by respected directors and starring talented young actors don't always work, and
The Legend of Bagger Vance is a case in point. For a film that runs a little over two hours, not a lot happens. One might logically anticipate that golfers will get more out of the film than those who shun the sport, but I don't think that's an accurate assumption. Redford has gone out of his way to make The Legend of Bagger Vance inclusive (that's the reason the game/life parallels are spelled out so blatantly). Despite its length, the movie isn't dull, but, once the end credits start rolling, it's unlikely to provoke a stronger reaction than a shrug. And, for a sports film that is striving for Olympian heights, such a lackluster response falls considerably short of what Redford was hoping to achieve. © 2000 James Berardinelli [Berardinelli’s rating: 2.5 stars out of 4 = 62.5%]

Labels: drama, fantasy, Matt Damon, reunion, Robert Redford, sport
IMDb 67/100 
MetaCritic (critics=47, viewers=78) 
RottenTomatoes (critics=43, viewers=65) 
Blu-ray

 

Sunday, June 14, 2020

Jason Bourne (2016) [PG-13] ****

A film review by James Berardinelli for ReelViews.net on July 28, 2016.

Fourteen years after the release of The Bourne Identity, the Bourne movies have deviated so drastically from Robert Ludlum’s source novels that, like James Bond, the film character exists separately from his written inspiration. Over the course of three ’00s movies (The Bourne Identity, The Bourne Supremacy, The Bourne Ultimatum), Matt Damon became Jason Bourne. In 2007, when he decided it was time to go, the filmmakers were left with a Sean Connery-sized dilemma and, as was the case with Connery, the eventual solution involved luring back the original actor. Damon’s return to the title role, the fifth film in the franchise, represents a coup for Universal Pictures. After Jeremy Renner failed to capture the public’s interest in The Bourne Legacy, the series’ future looked uncertain until Damon and co-writer/director Paul Greengrass agreed to terms. Despite regurgitating elements from the founding trilogy, Jason Bourne represents the best the series has yet offered.

Jason Bourne doesn’t deviate substantially from the established Bourne movie format. It’s Bourne (Matt Damon) against the CIA in a get them before they get you struggle. For this outing, the only one to return from the original Bourne trilogy (other than Jason) is Julia Stiles’ Nicky Parsons, an ex-agent who now works for a WikiLeaks-type organization. The CIA is populated by newcomers - director Robert Dewey (Tommy Lee Jones), cyber expert Heather Lee (Alicia Vikander), and a nameless shadowy assassin referred to only as The Asset (Vincent Cassel). The movie crisscrosses the globe, stopping in locations like Reykjavik, Athens, Berlin, London, and Las Vegas.

Jason Bourne is characterized by a relentless intensity that exceeds that of even The Bourne Ultimatum (the best of the first four films). Greengrass’ camerawork is part of the reason. His penchant for hand-held shots is highly effective in some of the movie’s chaotic scenes (such as a riot in Athens) but it has been tempered for the more static sequences. Damon’s interpretation of Bourne (as a killing machine whose pain is deeply buried but occasionally visible) works well within the context of the story and, like Arnold Schwarzenegger’s Terminator, he has very little dialogue. Damon does most of his acting with his eyes and jaw. The throbbing but not overpowering musical score (credited to John Powell and David Buckley) enhances the tension. When it comes to keeping audiences uncertain and white-knuckled, the movie rarely lets up. Prepare to be exhausted at the end of the two hour running time.

With Joan Allen, Chris Cooper, Brian Cox, and Albert Finney long gone, it’s time for some new blood at the CIA. Tommy Lee Jones gives a strong, Fugitive-like representation of the company man/patriot whose Nixonian approach to National Security makes him less-than-likable. Alicia Vikander plays her inexperienced but intelligent role with minimal emotion; her performance is closer to Ex Machina than her Oscar-winning turn in The Danish Girl. Vincent Cassel is on board to provide the kind of psychotic character he has become known for. Although the screenplay gives The Asset an ambiguous backstory, few viewers will find even a scintilla of goodwill for the man.

Although Jason Bourne is part of an ongoing franchise and works best for those who have seen at least the first three chapters (the movie has little or no connection to The Bourne Legacy), it’s like most other multi-sequel action series (James BondMission: Impossible) in that it can stand on its own. Bourne is the protagonist but not necessarily a hero. The CIA agents vary from being outright bad guys to people somewhere in the middle. Jason Bourne continues the theme of identity that was so important in the original trilogy but here it’s interleaved with the basic instincts of survival and revenge. If the latter is a dish best served cold, then Bourne is the perfect waiter.

The film’s ending allows for future installments of the prime storyline should Damon and Greengrass decide to return (at least insofar as the Bourne movies are concerned, they’re a package deal). The open-endedness, however, doesn’t leave the viewer unsatisfied. The key plot elements are all wrapped up and the loose ends are merely hooks that can be used to reel in another sequel. Jason Bourne is more than a just worthy addition to a popular franchise - it’s the cherry on the top. It proves that when a creative team puts forth the time and effort, financially motivated motion pictures can still be gratifying. Jason Bourne is two hours of exhilarating, unrelenting cinema. [Berardinelli’s rating: 3.5 out of 4 stars]

Labels: action, Julia Stiles, Matt Damon, spy, thriller






The Martian (2015) [PG-13] *****

A film review by James Berardinelli for ReelViews.net on Oct. 2, 2015.

The Martian is the latest in a series of realistic science fiction films - movies that eschew the space opera elements of the genre and concentrate instead on believable aspects. Following in the wake of Christopher Nolan's Interstellar (and featuring two of the same cast members), The Martian speculates about how a near-future manned Mars mission might evolve. With the exception of a slightly over-the-top ending, the film mostly avoids the Hollywood-isms that sometimes degrade science fiction into futuristic fantasy. This is neither an action-oriented motion picture nor a special effects extravaganza. It's an introspective story about what it might be like to be the sole inhabitant of a distant world and knowing that instant communication isn't possible and a rescue is at best a year away. It's also an examination of how necessity truly can be the mother of invention - not only for the survivor but for those on Earth seeking to find a way to save him.

The events of The Martian transpire in the near future, although an exact date isn't given. As the movie opens, the six-person crew of the Ares 3 mission are on the planet's surface conducting experiments and gathering samples. In addition to astronaut Mark Watney (Matt Damon) and mission Captain Melissa Lewis (Jessica Chastain), the crew includes pilot Rick Martinez (Michael Pena), chemist Alex Vogel (Aksel Hennie), and specialists Beth Johanssen (Kate Mara) and Chris Beck (Sebastian Stan). The approach of a major storm - one that has the potential of tearing apart the fragile artificial habitat and, literally, tipping over their escape rocket - forces Lewis to order an emergency evacuation. In the race to the escape craft, Watney is struck by a piece of flying debris, lost, and presumed dead. He is reluctantly left behind by his fellows. When NASA receives the news, director Teddy Sanders (Jeff Daniels) and Mars mission controller Vincent Kapoor (Chiwetel Ejiofor) make the news of the death public.

Watney isn't dead, however. Although injured, he is able to use an emergency medical kit to close a wound and, after coming to terms with the enormity of his situation, he assesses what he will have to do to survive. Within a month, NASA has become aware of his survival and, not long after, rudimentary communications are possible. The film then becomes a race against time to save Watney before his provisions run out.

Most movies about Mars (and there have been a lot of them) are hybrid science fiction-horror or science fiction-thriller productions with little emphasis on the science fiction part of the equation. Since The Martian isn't interested in the exploitation aspect, that makes it an outlier in the Mars canon. Instead, it's a close cousin to sci-fi stories like Moon, Gravity, and Interstellar and deals with some of the same themes and ideas as Cast Away and Touching the VoidThe Martian's drama evolves from showing how the character copes with isolation. There are certainly physical challenges but the psychological difficulties are the most compelling ones.

Although the concept of a modern day Robinson Crusoe marooned on Mars might sound like a depressing proposition, the film's tone never ventures into dark and downbeat territory. Without detracting from the seriousness of the situation, director Ridley Scott infuses the production with moments of low-key, appropriate comedy. Watney's introspective video journals illustrate not only his practicality and innovation but his wry (sometimes gallows) sense of humor. Likewise, some of the Earth-based scenes, while not openly comedic, are played with a lighthearted sensibility.

For Matt Damon, this is a rare opportunity to show his range. Neither action hero nor supporting character nor George Clooney sidekick, he gives a performance to rival The Departed as the best of his career.  One key difference: here, he isn't surrounded by the likes of Leonardo DiCaprio, Jack Nicholson, and Martin Sheen. This is Damon's movie and it's hard to find a flaw in the way he brings Watney to life. The fear, the anguish, the loneliness, the desperation, and the joy… they're all there. Only once does Watney give into despair and, on that occasion, it doesn't last long. The secondary cast is impressive, with names like Jessica Chastain, Kristin Wiig, Chiwetel Ejiofor, and Sean Bean lending their talents, but their roles aren't large. They support and never threaten to take the spotlight away from Damon. (Considering that he also played a stranded astronaut in Interstellar, one wonders whether he has become Hollywood's go-to guy for this kind of character.)

As a director, Ridley Scott is by no means a can't-miss proposition.  Although one can rarely fault his ambition, the results have been mixed, especially in recent years. When it comes to science fiction, however, Scott's track record is solid: Alien, Blade Runner, Prometheus - two bona fide classics and one flawed but compelling odyssey. The Martian is a different kind of film from those but no less impressive. Scott uses special effects as a tool to enhance the experience rather than as the means to define it. Many of the effects in The Martian are of the practical variety with CGI used primarily to add an otherworldly flavor to the Martian landscape. The space sequences are nearly as good as those in Gravity. The 3D, although not as impressive as in Alfonso Cuaron's 2013 picture, feels neither gimmicky nor unnecessary. As uneven a director as Scott can be, he can do some amazing things when he's on; this is one such occasion.

The Martian is based on Andy Weir's novel of the same name and uses a similar science-based approach to many of its scenes. NASA was involved both at the script stage and during filming and, although there are instances in which The Martian takes liberties with the laws of physics, it presents one of the most accurate screen depictions of space travel to date. This authenticity is one of the factors that attracted Damon and Scott to the project and Weir's continued involvement brought NASA on board.

In releasing The Martian, 20th Century Fox has fired the first shot in the 2015 Oscar competition. Although the science fiction genre is more often associated with the escapist fare of summer than the serious offerings of the fall, The Martian is an exception. Those who crave nonstop action and seizure-promoting editing may find this film's pace too deliberate. They may be unable to appreciate its character focus and slow but undeniable build-up of tension. This is science fiction for sophisticated audiences and, as such, a fulfilling and satisfying experience. [Berardinelli’s rating: 3.5 out of 4 stars]

Labels: adventure, drama, Matt Damon, sci-fi
Gloria Gaynor - I Will Survive - The Martian version



Friday, June 5, 2020

Interstellar (2014) [PG-13] ****

A film review by Stephanie Zacharek for VillageVoice.com, Oct. 29, 2014.

There’s so much space in Christopher Nolan’s nearly three-hour intergalactic extravaganza Interstellar that there’s almost no room for people. This is a gigantosaurus movie entertainment, set partly in outer space and partly in a futuristic dustbowl America where humans are in danger of dying out, and Nolan - who co-wrote the script with his brother, Jonathan Nolan - has front-loaded it with big themes and even bigger visuals. Interstellar is supposedly all about what it means to be human, but it's supersized in case we really are so out of touch that we need to have everything blown up IMAX-big. We used to look up at the sky and wonder at our place in the stars says Matthew McConaughey’s farmer-astronaut-dreamer in one of his many, many proclamations about life, family, and the cosmos. Now we just look down and worry about our place in the dirt. But even the dirt in Interstellar looks spectacularly art-directed. Nolan may be invoking Walker Evans, but Interstellar is really just Jethro Bodine–sized.

This is all the wonder money can buy, and then some. Nolan opens the movie with faux-documentary commentary from old folks settin’ a spell and reflecting on their youth in a dying, dust-choked world. One woman - recognizable as Ellen Burstyn - says that her father was a farmer, like everybody else back then. In the world of this woman’s childhood, there’s a surfeit of engineers and not enough people to grow food. Which means that men of science have been forced into the more menial (though not less important) job of coaxing life out of dry dirt.

McConaughey’s Cooper is one of these guys, though he can never disavow his science-geek roots. One of his two kids (played by Timothée Chalamet as a youngster, but he’ll grow up to be Casey Affleck) isn’t doing well in school; he’ll be placed as a farmer, instead of being one of the lucky few to advance to engineering school. But Cooper’s daughter, 12-year-old Murph (Mackenzie Foy, who will eventually morph into a petulant, one-note Jessica Chastain), soaks up her dad’s sciencey musings. She gets into trouble at school for showing off one of her father’s old books about the Apollo 11 lunar landing, which the asshole autocrats of the future have deemed propaganda, just a bit of fakery pulled off by the United States to bankrupt the Soviet Union.

Cooper will end up leaving Murph, and Earth: A seemingly random - but not really - chain of events leads him to a secret space station where an old professor of his, Michael Caine’s Dr. Brand, is planning a mission. Though NASA was dismantled long ago - space travel for exploration’s sake was long ago deemed frivolous by the government - Dr. Brand and his team, chief among them his daughter, Amelia (Anne Hathaway), believe that the only hope for mankind lies in the stars. Luckily, Brand has located a wormhole leading to another galaxy, which may contain at least one inhabitable planet. And so Cooper, along with Amelia and two other crew members (played by Wes Bentley and David Gyasi), head into space in search of dust-free air and unspoiled water.

Cooper and his colleagues encounter frozen worlds and watery ones, and the dangers they face are both existential and specific. The universe Nolan has invented for them, drawn from both science (the movie is partly inspired by the work of theoretical physicist Kip Thorne) and movie dreams (paging Stanley Kubrick), is vast, awe-inspiring, and terrifying. In an early scene, the crew chatters and pick at one another inside the cabin, but thanks to crackerjack cutting, camerawork, and sound design, we can float on the outside, where it’s deafeningly quiet - the planes of the ship hang delicately in the breach of nothingness. This vessel is so gorgeously alone; for a moment, Nolan captures the idea of space as a source of both wonder and despair.

But even the grandest visuals aren’t enough to carry Interstellar. A chief complaint filed against Alfonso Cuarón’s joy-and-anguish-in-space symphony Gravity was that the dialogue was sentimental, and there was too much of it. But in Interstellar, Cooper, a man of science, soaks up plenty of oxygen with his bromides about the importance of family. Other characters follow suit, apparently never having heard the song telling us that we’re people who need people. Nolan gives John Lithgow, as Cooper’s salt-of-the-earth father-in-law, healthy heaps of cornpone dialogue like: They’re saying this is the last harvest for okra. Forever.

There’s more: As a coda to a complicated explanation of the black hole, Bentley’s character adds helpfully that it’s a literal heart of darkness. Dylan Thomas’s Do not go gentle into that good night is quoted at least three times, in case we don’t grasp its significance the first two. At one point, three crew members leave the mother ship to explore a possibly life-sustaining planet. The catch, poignant in its implications, is that seven Earth years will pass for each hour they spend on this threateningly foreign soil. Gyasi’s character -- he’s the token black guy, but at least the movie has one -- stays behind, and when McConaughey and company return, not only is he visibly aged, but he’s wearing a plaid Redd Foxx bathrobe.

Look, maybe there’s science to back this up: For all we know, it’s possible astronauts do wear flannel in space. I know I’m supposed to be moved and amazed by Interstellar’s many pronouncements about how important it is to feel connected to our families and our fellow human beings, in addition to being awed by Nolan’s elaborate vision of pioneers bravely striking out into space, a/k/a the final frontier. And the special effects in Interstellar are, well, stellar: It earns the adjective handsome, which is great as far as that takes you. You sure get a big bang for your buck.

If Nolan is so godlike, you’d think he’d be better with actors. They don’t stand a shooting star’s chance in Interstellar. (Hans Zimmer’s droney, churchy organ score, the worst kind of Zimmermusik, doesn’t help.) Lithgow is a terrific actor - he’s already given one of the finest performances of the year, in Ira Sachs’s Love Is Strange. Can’t Nolan do better than cast him as pops in a cardigan, spewing lines cribbed from the Farmers’ Almanac? Hathaway’s big moment - her only moment, really - is a quavery speech about true love; she emotes like gangbusters as her eyes pool with Fantine-like tears. In the past few years, McConaughey has reinvented himself into a marvel of spark and fire and subtlety. What he does here isn’t acting; it’s superacting. There’s no other way to stand up to the manmade-monument quality of this material. In what should be McConaughey’s most moving scene - he faces the reality that his children have aged by 23 years, while he’s only a few hours older - Nolan trains the camera on the actor’s face so we can take the measure of his free-falling tears. The tears themselves aren’t the issue - it’s wholly believable that Cooper would cry. But we can see McConaughey working the strings. He’s like the Magic Mike version of male vulnerability, turning it all on for show. If he were to work with Nolan all the time, he’d be in grave danger of becoming a neck-tendon actor: He tightens his jaw every time he has to say something of great import, which here is way too often.

Nolan does have a seemingly inexhaustible store of extravagant ideas. As in Inception, with that dream vision of Paris folding in on itself - a wonderful, inventive image that stands out against the rest of that movie’s bland trickery - he comes up with one extraordinary visual idea in Interstellar: Cooper finds himself in a corrugated passageway whose walls appear to be made of strands of light - or are they books on a shelf? The metaphor is lovely, a suggestion that books - all paper, glue, ink, and string, so old-fashioned and so touchingly fragile - still hold incomparable power. Their rays reach out to us like sunbeams.

But that’s about as subtle as Interstellar gets. Whatever his strengths may be, Nolan lacks the human touch. His movies are numbingly sexless, and by that I don’t mean they need sex scenes or nudity - those things are rarely really about sex anyway. But in all of Nolan’s films, human connection is such a noble idea that it’s beyond the grasp of flesh-and-blood people. Nothing in Interstellar is ever ragged or raw or dirty (though there is, admittedly, a lot of dust). Characters gabble on about taking risks, about needing one another, but they never leap toward anything so dangerous as intimacy. Rage against the dying of the light! Nolan urges us, and he himself burns through a great deal of electricity and gas to keep his spectacle glowing for as long as possible. He has so much invested in showing us. He just doesn’t want to get close enough to touch us. Space suits him just fine.
[Zacharek’s rating: 50%]

The supporting cast includes Leah Cairns (as Lois), Matt Damon (as Mann), William Devane (as Williams) and Topher Grace (as Getty).