Pages

Saturday, November 11, 2017

Fear (La paura) (Angst) (1954) [NR] ***

Because this film is not widely available, and you’re unlikely to ever see it, this film review contains SPOILERS, so be aware.  Written by Sergio Amidei, Franz von Treuberg and Roberto Rossellini, and directed by Roberto Rossellini, Fear tells the story of Irene Wagner (Ingrid Bergman) who, together with her husband Professor Albert Wagner (Mathias Wieman) owns a pharmaceutical company in post-WWII West Germany.

Irene, bored and disillusioned with her life, has been involved in an affair with a handsome younger man, Erich Baumann (Kurt Kreuger), and as the film starts, she’s trying to end it, but lacks the willpower. Then, late one night, Irene is accosted outside her garage by Luisa Vidor, alias Joanna Schultze (Renate Mannhardt). Luisa claims to be Erich’s former girlfriend and she’s angry with Irene for stealing him. She threatens to go to Irene’s husband Albert unless Irene pays her off.

As Luisa’s blackmail demands increase, and Irene tries to keep a lid on her affair with Erich, she grows increasingly anxious and fearful. Finally, late one night at a bar, Luisa demands DM20,000 (roughly $5,000) for the return of a diamond ring she had stolen from Irene. Irene tells Luisa she won’t pay her anything and she’s going to the police. (She knows Luisa is from Berlin and has had problems with the police in the past.) Luisa breaks down, confesses that Irene’s husband is behind the whole scheme, including the blackmail. Distraught, Irene sees no way out except suicide, but Albert arrives at the laboratory in time, apologizes and the two reconcile.

This was the fifth and last film made together by Bergman and Rossellini, and some critics noted that their marriage was coming apart in 1954, and perhaps that was reflected in the film. Bergman carries the film, even though she has little chemistry with either Wieman or Kreuger. And while she has clearly aged in the twelve years since she made Casablanca with Humphrey Bogart, she will make twenty-three more films, win two more Oscars (Anastasia and Murder on the Orient Express) and appear in numerous stage productions, before succumbing to cancer in 1982 at age sixty-seven.

Filmed in Munich, Germany, in both German and English languages, the film is in black & white, and the print I viewed was dubbed in Italian and subtitled in English. The original Italian title was La paura, the English Fear, and the German Angst. Other than Bergman’s performance, the acting is amateurish, and the film may be most useful as a look back at West Germany, nine years after the end of WWII. Having studied high school and college chemistry in the late fifties and early sixties, the pharmaceutical laboratory depicted in the film is just as I remembered it.

If you are interested in the Bergman-Rossellini collaboration between 1950 and 1954, I’d suggest starting with Journey to Italy (Viaggio in Italia) (1954). That was Rossellini’s most important film of the period, recognized as one of the one hundred most important films of the twentieth century, and the film that defined Italian neorealism (Rossellini, De Sica, Visconti, De Santis, Fellini, et. al.) and deeply influenced the French New Wave (Resnais, Godard, Truffaut, Rohmer, Chabrol, et. al.)

Labels: drama, Fifties, Ingrid Bergman


Journey to Italy (Viaggio in Italia) (1954) [NR] *****

Journey to Italy (Voyage to Italy, Viaggio in Italia)

A film review by A.O Scott, for the N.Y. Times, April 30, 2013.

The 1950s are full of movies that were initially greeted, by critics and audiences, with indifference or derision, only to be hailed as masterpieces in hindsight. Vertigo, The Searchers and The Sweet Smell of Success are among the best-known examples of this kind of revisionism. Another, only slightly less famous, is Roberto Rossellini’s Viaggio in Italia, a film so maligned and neglected in 1955, the year of its American release, that it did not receive a review in The New York Times.

Better late than never. A restored digital version of Voyage to Italy (one of several English titles that have been used over the years) begins a nine-day run at Film Forum on Wednesday, which seems as good an occasion as any to update the critical record. As it happens, the treachery of time - the unwelcome intrusion of the past, the empty languor of the present, and the terrifying uncertainty of the future - is one of Rossellini’s themes, and part of what makes this film, for all its charming glimpses of a bygone era, feel so unnervingly contemporary.

Its failure no doubt had something to do with the scandal that embroiled the movie’s director and its star, Ingrid Bergman, and also with the ideological volatility of Italian cultural life. In 1948, after seeing Paisan and Rome: Open City, Bergman wrote Rossellini a letter offering her services if he should need a Swedish actress who speaks English very well. While making Stromboli, (1950) they began an affair that ended both of their marriages and provoked the highly selective moral outrage of the American press. In his own country, Rossellini was attacked less for marital infidelity than for betraying the cause of neorealism, allowing his camera to stray from local social problems to Hollywood stars.

And yet the reality of postwar Italy is very much visible in Voyage, as is a strong intimation of the direction of Italian cinema in the coming years. The film follows Katherine and Alex Joyce (Bergman and George SandersAll About Eve), a British couple who arrive in Naples to sell a piece of property belonging to a recently deceased and highly enigmatic relative known as Uncle Homer. That business transaction is never concluded, and is in any case a distraction from the luxurious stasis that envelops Alex and Katherine, a state that might be described as a blend of ennui (boredom) and la dolce far niente (pleasant relaxation in carefree idleness).

The two languish for a while at a hotel and at Uncle Homer’s villa, where the frosty state of their relations fails to melt in the Mediterranean sun. Katherine spends her days sightseeing in the Museum of Archaeology and experiencing a tremor of anxiety at the Cave of the Cumaean Sibyl. Alexander takes an excursion to Capri, where he flirts and socializes.

Sanders later complained that the story of the film was never understood at any time, by anyone, least of all the audience when the picture was released. And he had a point, even though he may have missed Rossellini’s point. Voyage to Italy is not driven by the usual machinery of plot and exposition, but rather by a succession of moods, an emotional logic alternately reflected and obscured by the picturesque surroundings. The rich symbolism of the Italian landscape - the volcanic pools at Vesuvius, the ruins of Pompeii, the vistas that have stirred the imagination of artists at least since Virgil - makes the emptiness of the Joyces’ marriage all the more palpable and painful. Their emotional and spiritual sterility contrasts with the fertility signified by the baby carriages and pregnant women Katherine encounters every time she ventures into Naples, and also by the religious procession of the film’s devastating final scene.

Rossellini’s way of dissolving narrative into atmosphere, of locating drama in the unspoken inner lives of his characters, anticipates some of what Michelangelo Antonioni would do a few years later in L’AvventuraVoyage to Italy is thus in the vanguard of what Pauline Kael would disparagingly call come-dressed-as-the-sick-soul-of-Europe parties. Some of us will never tire of those soirees, with their black-tied gloom and elegant suffering, and will therefore relish the beauty and melancholy of this voyage, along with its touristic snapshots and heart-tugging Neapolitan songs.

The Joyces, though their manners and modes of dress mark them as creatures of another, perhaps more refined age, are immediately recognizable in their loneliness, their cynicism and their thwarted desire to connect and to feel. It may be too late. Voyage to Italy takes place in a series of simultaneous aftermaths - of World War II, of a glorious ancient civilization, of Uncle Homer’s wild life, of whatever passion once united Katherine and Alex. And yet amid all this exhaustion it finds signs of vitality. In its time, this film represented the arrival of something new, and even now it can feel like a bulletin from the future.

Labels: drama, Fifties, Ingrid Bergman, romance, rom-drama-faves
Ingrid Bergman Remembered (YouTube 50:15) 

Europe ’51 (Europa ’51) (1952) [UR] ****

A film review by Dr. Svet Atanasov, for blu-ray.com on September 11, 2013.

Winner of International Award at the Venice Film Festival, Roberto Rossellini's Europe '51 (1952) arrives on Blu-ray courtesy of Criterion. The supplemental features on the disc include the Italian-language version of the film, Europa '51; an archival introduction by Roberto Rossellini; exclusive video interview with Italian film critic Adriano Apra; and a video interview with Italian film scholar Elena Dagrada. In English or Italian, with optional English SDH and English subtitles. Region-A locked.

A tragic event forces the beautiful socialite Irene Girard (Ingrid BergmanIntermezzo, Casablanca, Notorious) to temporarily abandon her wealthy husband (Alexander KnoxKhartoum, Crack in the World) and enter the world of the poor and underprivileged. She begins spending time with single mothers who can barely make ends meet, prostitutes, and underpaid workers, and then begins reevaluating her life.

In Rome's slums, Irene quickly realizes that her previous life has been a meaningless illusion because she never cared about her friends and their feelings. Overwhelmed by guilt, Irene also begins to ponder the importance of faith.

This often overlooked film directed by the great Roberto Rossellini is essentially a contemporary replica of his excellent The Flowers of St. Francis. Predictably, the focus of attention in it is not so much on Irene's actual journey through the slums, but on her gradual character transformation and the humility and happiness she rediscovers after she abandons her posh lifestyle.

This is also a film that is seriously concerned with the polarizing division between the poor and the wealthy in post-war Italy. Indeed, the sense of guilt that initiates Irene's character transformation is only a pretext to question the values and beliefs of the wealthy, as well as to promote various leftists ideas and principles.

The tragedy that occurs in the film is a product of the division – it is inspired by the coldness and isolation the wealthy have become comfortable with. After Irene leaves her family, Rossellini points the camera to the short discussions where her decision is debated to further expose the ignorance of those who have had an active role in her life. Pay close attention to their attitude and you will see that it mirrors Irene's from the party sequence in the beginning of the film.

Interestingly enough, Irene's transformation also leads to isolation. Of course, this time it is her relationship with the poor that is responsible for it, but she is again removed from the real world and consequently forced to suffer.

Bergman is at her very best in Europe '51. The sizable transformation she undergoes is remarkable. The great Giulietta Masina plays the single mother from the slums whose life is a lot simpler and a lot more fulfilling than Irene's. The prostitute Irene befriends is played by the beautiful Teresa Pellati. Alexander Knox is the wealthy husband, while Ettore Giannini plays Irene's quiet left-leaning cousin Andrea.

Europe '51 was lensed by Aldo Tonti, one of the greatest post-war Italian cinematographers. (Marcelo Pagliero's Roma città libera, Luchino Visconti's Ossessione, Federico Fellini's Nights Of Cabiria).

Rossellini's film exists in a number of different versions: the Venice version (Europa '51, Italian-language), the Italian theatrical version (Europa '51, Italian-language), the U.S. version (The Greatest Love, English-language), and the International version (Europe '51, English-language). Criterion's Blu-ray release contains two versions of the film: the international English-language version, Europe '51, which runs at approximately 110 minutes (01.49.46), and the Italian-language international version, Europa '51, which runs at approximately 119 minutes. (Please note that Bergman spoke her lines in English). [Atanasof’s rating: **** ½ out of 5 stars]

Labels: drama, Fifties, Ingrid Bergman






Stromboli (1950) [NR] ****

A film review by Dr. Svet Atanasov, for blu-ray.com, on Sept. 24, 2013.

Roberto Rossellini's Stromboli (1950) arrives on Blu-ray courtesy of Criterion. The release contains two versions of the film, English and Italian. Also included on this release are: short introduction to the film by Roberto Rossellini, exclusive new video interview with Italian film critic Adriano Apra, and Nino Bizzarri's documentary film Rossellini Under the Volcano. In Italian or English, with optional English and English SDH subtitles. Region-A locked.

Stromboli, the first collaboration between Italian master Roberto Rossellini and the great Ingrid Bergman, begins in a displaced persons' camp somewhere in Farfa, Italy. There the beautiful Karin (Bergman), a Lithuanian refugee, hopes to get a permit that will allow her to emigrate from Italy to Argentina. While waiting for the Argentinean authorities to review her application, Karin frequently sees Antonio (Mario Vitale), a charming soldier from Sicily who knows only a few words of English.

When her application is rejected, Karin agrees to marry Antonio and go back with him to Stromboli, a small but supposedly very beautiful Mediterranean island. The enthusiastic Antonio immediately promises Karin, in broken English, that they will have a happy life together.

But shortly after they reach Stromboli, Karin begins to question her decision to follow Antonio because the island is very much a place where time seems to have stopped. Excluding a few fishermen, there are hardly any young people around. And not too far away from Antonio's house, which looks more like a hut, there is an active volcano. Feeling misled, Karin begins questioning her husband, and later on, barely able to contain her anger, she announces that she will leave him as soon as she can. When Antonio vows to work hard to give her what she needs, Karin tells him that he simply does not deserve her.

The local priest occasionally meets Karin and tries to help her understand the way people on Stromboli live their lives, but she becomes even more depressed. Eventually, after the volcano erupts and nearly destroys Antonio's house, Karin vows to do the impossible - cross the mountain alone and reach the village on the opposite side of the island where she can ask the owner of the only motorboat in the area to transport her back to the mainland.

The majority of Stromboli feels like a documentary feature about an exotic place where life has a very unique rhythm. The camera follows closely the disillusioned Karin as she visits different corners of the island and tries to come to terms with the fact that she has essentially become a prisoner, but large portions of the film are also dedicated to fishing rituals and the seemingly alive volcano.

Both Karin and the volcano undergo fascinating transformations. The first transformation is linked to religious overtones that effectively change the manner in which the film is viewed and ultimately understood. (They are in harsh contrast with its neo-realistic qualities). The second mirrors Karin's behavior. At first calm and seemingly willing to coexist with the fishermen, the volcano suddenly comes alive and then nearly destroys the tiny village.

The message of the film is that life is unpredictable and frequently demanding painful sacrifices. It feels terribly relevant today, when so many women like Bergman's Karin are willing to risk a lot, or everything, when promised a better future.

Three official versions of Stromboli exist, but according to film scholar Elena Dagrada, an expert on Rossellini's films with Bergman, none can be considered official or complete. They are: RKO's American version which was released in 1950, a longer international version which was shown at the Venice Film Festival in 1950, and the slightly shorter Italian-language version, Stromboli terra di Dio, which was released in Italian cinemas.

Criterion's Blu-ray release contains two versions of the film: the English-language version, Stromboli, which runs at approximately 106 minutes, and the Italian-language version, Stromboli terra di Dio, which runs at approximately 100 minutes.

Criterion's Blu-ray release of Roberto Rossellini's Stromboli, a film which has not been easy to see on this side of the Atlantic for years, is a revelation. It contains two versions of the film both of which have been restored and look very good. As far as I am concerned, Criterion's 3 Films by Roberto Rossellini Starring Ingrid Bergman box set is one of the year's must-own releases.

Labels: drama, Fifties, Ingrid Bergman

Blogger’s comment: After the end of WW II, Italian neo-realist director Roberto Rossellini made two films, Rome, Open City (1945) and Paisan (1946). Ingrid Bergman saw them, and having grown bored with Hollywood-style filmmaking, wrote to Rossellini and offered her services as an actress. Rossellini came to California, met Bergman and her surgeon husband Petter Lindstrom, and decided to cast her in his upcoming film Stromboli. Filming began in 1948 on the volcanic island of Stromboli, northeast of Sicily, using a largely amateur cast and without a shooting script, on a tiny island with an active volcano and without electricity or water. Despite the harsh filming conditions (one crew member died during filming), Bergman and Rossellini began a passionate love affair, resulting in Bergman’s pregnancy. Divorce and proxy marriage followed, and son Roberto was joined by twin daughters Isabella and Ingrid Rossellini. The marriage and filmmaking relationship lasted eight years and ended in divorce.

While Stromboli is interesting from an historical perspective, Rossellini’s neo-realistic style of making movies, using an amateur cast and no script, eventually proved to be not Bergman’s style.

Personally, I find the film dated and unapproachable, the ending totally unsatisfying and a complete waste of Ingrid Bergman’s incredible talent, and I award the film 3 stars out of a possible 5 stars.

Arch of Triumph (1948) [UR] ***/****

A film review by Jeffrey Kauffman for Blu-ray.com on July 24, 2014.

If Parisian tour guides are to be believed (and many of them are British, so their comments must be taken with a grain or two of Francophobic salt), French insurance companies specifically deny coverage for any of Paris' insanely busy roundabouts, like the one that encircles one of the most famous icons of French history and national pride, the Arc de Triomphe. As someone who madly decided to rent a car in Paris the last time I was there (ostensibly to get to Normandy, but which by default included urban Parisian driving), I can vouch for the fact that you pretty much take your life into your hands anytime you venture into a Parisian roundabout, whether on foot or in a vehicle, and so the fact that insurance companies refuse to cover any accidents in these locations strikes me as completely plausible. There is in fact a little coterie of observers who congregate regularly at the apex of the Champs-Elysées for the very opportunity to witness a fender bender (or several) in the grand parade of traffic that marauds around the Arc de Triomphe. There's a different if no less deadly kind of danger afoot in Lewis Milestone's largely forgotten 1948 opus Arch of Triumph, a film which opens with a stunning view of the monument (plus what looks like a not very convincing miniature), as an instant visual glyph that we're in the City of Lights. It's the last few relatively calm hours before the outbreak of World War II, in a rain soaked winter of 1938, and while true hostilities have not yet broken out between France and Germany, there's little doubt that the bad guys in the film, as personified by a dapper if depraved Charles Laughton in a showy supporting role, are Nazis.

While Arch of Triumph bears literary origins, having been culled from a novel by Erich Maria Remarque which had been a bestselling blockbuster in 1945, it's more than obvious that the ghost of Casablanca (1942) rather uneasily haunts much of this film, and not only because of Ingrid Bergman's participation. (In a side note, it's instructive to note that director Lewis Milestone cut his career teeth on All Quiet on the Western Front, one of the most famous war films of all time and another film based on a novel by Remarque.) Once again, there are refugees trying to get from Point A to Point B, but being hobbled by an incipient Nazi obstacle course.

The focal refugee is Dr. Ravic (a seriously wan Charles Boyer), a physician who in Remarque's original was a German émigré now practicing (illegally) in Paris, but who is in the film unavoidably Gallic (in accent and manner if not in actual nationality) due to Boyer's inherent qualities. Ravic has escaped from being a prisoner of the Nazis, though he still bears both physical and psychological wounds from the situation. The good doctor is haunted by memories of this torture, especially since it ended up killing his wife. The Nazi in charge of the operation was a bully named Von Haake (Charles Laughton), and Ravic is absolutely certain he's seen the villain traipsing through the rainy streets of Paris. Or - is he hallucinating?

One night while strolling through, yes, the rainy streets of Paris (this is one of the most relentlessly soggy war movies ever) Ravic saves a young woman from what appears to be a suicide attempt. Her name is Joan Madou (Ingrid Bergman), and she is rebounding (none too well, it seems) from another suicide - that of her lover. Ravic brings her back to his flat to help her get her emotional bearings, and soon sets her up as a chanteuse at a local nightclub which is frequented by White Russian glitterati who have had several decades' practice at being refugees. The doorman there is a former Russian noble named Boris Morosov (Louis Calhern), who is a friend of Ravic's and who, in the film, is given most of the weightier philosophical dialogue.

Joan begins to fall rather heavily for Ravic, but Ravic is aware that his status is precarious at best, and he doesn't want to be leading the obviously emotionally unbalanced woman along into a romance that is probably doomed from the outset. Ravic is also dealing with his own issues, unable to forget or forgive the monstrous behavior of Von Haake. Still, the two take halting steps toward each other, steps which are temporarily waylaid when Ravic's greatest fear – deportation - actually comes to pass. That sets the film out on its equally baroque second act, where Ravic returns after exile to find Joan living the high life as a kept woman and Von Haake still traipsing around those rainy Parisian streets.

There are a number of things ailing Arch of Triumph, the chief of which is an overstuffed length (the film clocks in at well over two hours, evidently cut down from a four hour rough cut). Remarque's novel was apparently a very dense affair with tons of characters (many of whom don't even make it to the film version), but in trying to capture as much of the flavor of the novel as possible, Milestone and his co-writer Harry Brown fail to adequately shape the morass that's left, offering a kind of sloppy, drawn out doomed romance playing out against the background of a burgeoning global conflict. The best thing about the film is its palpable sense of melancholy. Boyer and Bergman both create completely convincing portraits of wounded souls struggling to survive in a world that makes no sense and a place where neither of them belongs, but too much time is spent on the romantic angle to make what is arguably the film's real calling card - Ravic's quest for revenge against Von Haake - resonate as deeply as it might have otherwise.

It's no mere coincidence that what is arguably the film's strongest sequence in fact deals with that very quest for revenge. It's an incredibly brutal scene (and just as incredible, evidently what's in the film pales to what the censors took out), and it suddenly gives voice to all the tamped down melancholy that's gone before. It's okay to repeatedly see a misty eyed Ingrid Bergman, but unless Sam is there to sing As Time Goes By, it just doesn't have the same impact.

Though the rain is relentless in Arch of Triumph, unfortunately lightning doesn't strike twice, and this World War II refugee romance starring Ingrid Bergman can hardly be placed in the same category as the immortal Casablanca. If the seriously overstuffed second act had been aggressively trimmed, letting the film focus on the revenge angle earlier, Arch of Triumph would at least have been an agreeable enough effort. Still, fans of the stars may want to check this out, but they should be prepared for less than optimal video and (to a less extent) audio. [Kauffman’s rating: *** out of 5 stars]

Labels: drama, Ingrid Bergman, romance, tragedy, WWII
Blu-ray 




Notorious (1946) [NR] *****

A film review by Roger Ebert on August 17, 1997.

Alfred Hitchcock's Notorious is the most elegant expression of the master's visual style, just as Vertigo is the fullest expression of his obsessions. It contains some of the most effective camera shots in his--or anyone’s--work, and they all lead to the great final passages in which two men find out how very wrong they both were.

This is the film, with Casablanca, that assures Ingrid Bergman’s immortality. She plays a woman whose notorious reputation encourages U.S. agents to recruit her to spy on Nazis in postwar Rio. And that reputation nearly gets her killed, when the man she loves mistrusts her. His misunderstanding is at the center of a plot in which all of the pieces come together with perfect precision, so that two people walk down a staircase to their freedom, and a third person climbs steps to his doom.

Hitchcock made the film in 1946, when the war was over but the Cold War was just beginning. A few months later, he would have made the villains Communists, but as he and Ben Hecht worked on the script, Nazis were still uppermost in their minds. (An opening subtitle says: Miami, Florida, 3:20 p.m., April 20, 1946--admirably specific, but as unnecessary as the similarly detailed information at the beginning of Psycho.)

The story stars Bergman as a patriotic American named Alicia Huberman, whose father is a convicted Nazi spy. Alicia is known for drinking and apparent promiscuity, and is recruited by an agent named Devlin (Cary Grant) to fly to Rio and insinuate herself into the household of a spy ring led by Sebastian (Claude Rains). Sebastian once loved her, and perhaps he still does; Devlin is essentially asking her to share the spy's bed to discover his secrets. And this she is willing to do, because by the time he asks her, she is in love--with Devlin.

All of these sexual arrangements are of course handled with the sort of subtle dialogue and innuendo that Hollywood used to get around the production code. There is never a moment when improper behavior is actually stated or shown, but the film leaves no doubt. By the time all of the pieces are in place, we actually feel more sympathy for Sebastian than for Devlin. He may be a spy but he loves Alicia sincerely, while Devlin may be an American agent but has used Alicia's love to force her into the arms of another man.

Hitchcock was known for his attention to visual details. He drew storyboards of every scene before shooting it, and slyly plays against Grant’s star power in the scene introducing Devlin to the movie. At a party the night her father has been convicted, Alicia drinks to forget. The camera positions itself behind the seated Devlin, so we see only the back of his head. He anchors the shot as the camera moves left and right, following the morally ambiguous Alicia as she flirts, drinks and tries to forget.

There are more famous shots the next morning. Alicia awakens with a hangover, and there is a gigantic foreground close-up of a glass of Alka-Seltzer (it will be paired much later in the movie with a huge foreground coffee cup that we know contains arsenic). From her point of view, she sees Devlin in the doorway, backlit and upside down. As she sits up, he rotates 180 degrees. He suggests a spy deal. She refuses, talking of her plans to take a cruise. He plays a secret recording that proves she is, after all, patriotic--despite her loose image. As the recording begins, she is in shadow. As it continues, she is in bars of light. As it ends, she is in full light. Hitchcock has choreographed the visuals so that they precisely reflect what is happening.

The film is rich with other elegant shots, the most famous beginning with the camera on a landing high above the entrance hall of Sebastian’s mansion in Rio. It ends, after one unbroken movement, with a close-up of a key in Alicia's nervously twisting hand. The key will open the wine cellar, where Devlin (posing as a guest) will join Alicia in trying to find Sebastian’s secret. One of the bottles contains not wine but a radioactive substance used in bombs. Of course, it could contain anything--maps, codes, and diamonds--because it is a MacGuffin (Hitchcock's name for that plot element that everyone is concerned about, although it hardly matters what it is).

The Hecht screenplay is ingenious in playing the two men against one another. Sebastian, played by Rains, is smaller, more elegant, more vulnerable, and dominated by his forbidding mother (Leopoldine Konstantin). Devlin, played by Grant, is tall, physically imposing, crude at times, suspicious where Sebastian is trusting. Both men love her but the wrong man trusts her, and the plot leads to a moment of inspired ingenuity in which Devlin is able to escort Alicia out of the Nazi mansion in full view of all of the spies, and the circumstances are such that nobody can stop him. (There is a point earlier in the film where Devlin walks up the same staircase, and if you count his steps you will find that on the way down he and Alicia descend more steps than there actually are--Hitchcock's way of prolonging the suspense.)

Throughout Hitchcock's career, he devised stories in which elegant women, usually blond, were manipulated into situations of great danger. Hitchcock was the master manipulator, with the male actors as his surrogates. Vertigo treats this theme so openly it almost gives the game away. But look how it works in Notorious, where Devlin (like the Jimmy Stewart character in Vertigo) grooms and trains an innocent woman to be exactly who he desires her to be, and then makes her do his bidding.

The great erotic moment in Vertigo is the one where the man kisses the woman of his fantasy, while the room whirls around him. There is a parallel scene in Notorious, and it was famous at the time as the longest kiss in the history of the movies. It was not, however, a single kiss, as Tim Dirks points out in his essay on the film (http://www.filmsite.org/noto.html). The production code forbade a kiss lasting longer than three seconds, and so Bergman and Grant alternate kissing with dialogue and eye-play, while never leaving one another's arms. The sequence begins on a balcony overlooking Rio, encompasses a telephone call and a discussion of the dinner menu, and ends with a parting at the apartment door, taking three minutes in all. The three-second rule led to a better scene; an actual 180-second kiss might look like an exercise in slobbering.

The choice of Ingrid Bergman for the role was ideal; she subtly combined the noble and the carnal. Consider Casablanca (all of the viewers of Notorious would have), in which she lives with a resistance hero but in her heart loves a scruffy bar owner, and yet emerges as an idealistic heroine. In Notorious, we never seriously doubt that she is the heroine, but we can understand why the Grant character does. She appears to be a dipsomaniac, and besides, she sleeps with Sebastian. But she does it because she loves Devlin. Devlin has difficulty in loving a woman who would do that; one is reminded of Groucho Marx, who refused to join any club that would have him as a member.

So many movies have ended in obligatory chases and shoot-outs that the ability to write a well-crafted third act has almost died out. Among its many achievements, Notorious ends well. Like clockwork, the inevitable events of the last 10 minutes take place, and they all lead to the final perfect shot, in which another Nazi says to Sebastian, Alex, will you come in, please? I wish to talk to you. And Alex goes in, knowing he will never come out alive. [Ebert’s rating: **** out of 4 stars]

Labels: action, drama, film-noir, Ingrid Bergman, romance, spy, thriller



Saturday, July 22, 2017

Saratoga Trunk (1946) [UR] ****

Gary Cooper and Ingrid Bergman star in this romantic drama about a Texas gambler and an illegitimate Creole daughter of an aristocratic New Orleans family who work together to seek justice from a society that has rejected them both. Based on the novel by Edna Ferber, the title refers to a short rail trunk line in upstate New York.

The first hour of the film is set in 1875 New Orleans. Bergman’s character, Clio Dulaine, has just arrived from Paris with her servants Angelique and Cupidon. A beautiful, smart and ambitious young woman, Clio’s plan is to seek revenge on the Dulaine family, who’d effectively run her out of town fifteen years earlier. Clio’s mother had had an affair with Nicholas Dulaine, and when he tried to end the affair, Clio’s mother attempted to kill herself, but Nicholas ended up being shot dead in the process of preventing it.

However, soon after arriving in New Orleans, Clio’s plans are altered when she meets and becomes infatuated with Gary Cooper’s character, the gambler Colonel Clint Maroon. While there’s a strong physical attraction between the two, Clio tells Clint of her plans to entrap a rich man into marrying her one day. Clint tells Clio that he is headed to Saratoga, New York for the spring horse racing and gambling, and suggests that she might well find a rich husband there. So, having accepted a sizable settlement from the Dulaine family to leave New Orleans and never return, Clio takes Angelique and Cupidon and heads for Saratoga.

Saratoga is home to several mineral baths or springs, as well as a short rail trunk line connecting to the main rail line between upstate New York coal mines and New York City. Thus, the trunk line is very valuable and is the focus of two railroad groups attempting to control it. So, while Clio attempts to manipulate the wealthy Bartholomew Van Steed into proposing marriage, Clint ingratiates himself with some railroad stockholders allied with Van Steed, and then provides the needed muscle to take on the other railroad group. A spectacular train crash precedes a rail-side brawl between the competing groups, in which Clint and Cupidon are injured. Naturally this brings out Clio’s nurturing side, and she rejects Van Steed in favor of Clint.

This film was the second pairing for Cooper and Bergman, following For Whom the Bell Tolls (1943), also directed by Sam Wood. Although not shot in wide-screen Technicolor (as was For Whom the Bell Tolls), I enjoyed this film far more. The dialogue and the unspoken chemistry between Cooper and Bergman is outstanding, and Bergman plays to perfection the part of a beautiful woman, highly skilled in the art of manipulating men. At 135 minutes, the film is long, and the two parts, New Orleans and Saratoga, do not blend well together. It’s been suggested that it would have worked better as two films or a mini-series, but if you love Cooper and Bergman together, the time will pass quickly. Actually filmed right after Casablanca (1942), Bergman was in her late twenties. She had fully developed as an actress, having been on stage and screen for nearly half her life, and she was at the height of her physical beauty and charisma. If you enjoyed Ingrid Bergman in Intermezzo (1939), Casablanca (1942), For Whom the Bell Tolls (1943), Gaslight (1944), Spellbound (1945) or Notorious (1946), you won’t want to miss Saratoga Trunk.

Labels: drama, history, Ingrid Bergman, period, romance, western